Today's hottest deals

Acer Aspire 5560

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 1%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 36%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (82nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 18 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 41.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics2.45% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 15 years and 3 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
SystemAcer Aspire 5560  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer Aspire 5560
Memory4 GB free of 6 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20111205
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 05 '22 at 22:20
Run Duration111 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A6-3400M APU
Socket FS1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 1.4 GHz
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
41.2% Average
Memory 66.2
1-Core 31.3
2-Core 63.9
36% 53.8 Pts
4-Core 96.8
8-Core 98.4
13% 97.6 Pts
64-Core 95.4
6% 95.4 Pts
Poor: 25%
This bench: 41.2%
Great: 41%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 6520G
Acer(1025 059F) 512MB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 8.834.1.2000
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
2.45% Terrible
Lighting 2.9
Reflection 4.4
Parallax 2.6
2% 3.3 fps
MRender 4.1
Gravity 2.1
Splatting 3.4
3% 3.2 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 2.45%
Great: 3%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Toshiba MK6459GSXP 640GB
554GB free (System drive)
Firmware: GN00
SusWrite @10s intervals: 64 70 70 71 74 74 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)
41.2% Average
Read 72.9
Write 73.1
Mixed 22.1
SusWrite 70.5
43% 59.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.6
109% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 41.2%
Great: 45%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown NT2GC64B88B0NS-CG NT4GC64B8HB0NS-CG 6GB
1333, 1333 MHz
2048, 4096 MB
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
33% Below average
MC Read 14.8
MC Write 11.4
MC Mixed 10.4
35% 12.2 GB/s
SC Read 5.3
SC Write 6.1
SC Mixed 6.6
17% 6 GB/s
Latency 111
36% 111 ns
Poor: 19%
This bench: 33%
Great: 31%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Aspire 5560 Builds (Compare 42 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 36%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Aspire 5560

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback