Today's hottest

Amazon Ebay

deals

CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD

TEST
YOUR PC

ADD TO PC
BUILD

Fujitsu ESPRIMO Q9000

Performance Results


Gaming 8% Tree trunk	Desktop 51% Yacht	Workstation 7% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (8th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 92 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 35.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	24.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	32.6% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (61%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Fujitsu ESPRIMO Q9000 (all builds)
Motherboard	AOpen D1007
Memory	2.7 GB free of 6 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display	3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors, 3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20110221
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Jan 28 '21 at 22:13
Run Duration	151 Seconds
Run User	DEU-User
Background CPU	61%

Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7 M 640 5,045 User benchmarks, average bench 43% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 3 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (14^th percentile)	35.5% Below average	Memory 54.6 1-Core 63.3 2-Core 88.4 43% 68.8 Pts	4-Core 96.6 8-Core 103 13% 99.8 Pts	64-Core 110 7% 110 Pts
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 35.5% Great: 49%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59 946,701 User benchmarks, average bench 29% Zotac(19DA 1454) CLim: 1923 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 461.40 Relative performance (0^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	24.4% Poor	Lighting 29 Reflection 39.5 Parallax 29.1 24% 32.5 fps	MRender 34.2 Gravity 35.8 Splatting 26.9 26% 32.3 fps
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 24.4% Great: 33%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Sandisk S3 1T00 1TB 12,396 User benchmarks, average bench 95% 781GB free (System drive) Firmware: 415000RL SusWrite @10s intervals: 124 116 109 132 142 149 MB/s Relative performance (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	32.6% Below average	Read 146 Write 22.1 Mixed 73 SusWrite 129 20% 92.5 MB/s	4K Read 14.1 4K Write 18.5 4K Mixed 16.3 52% 16.3 MB/s	DQ Read 94.9 DQ Write 21.5 DQ Mixed 45.8 37% 54.1 MB/s
Poor: 65% ↑ This bench: 32.6% Great: 118%
WD My Passport 25E2 2TB 8,938 User benchmarks, average bench 32% 1TB free, PID 25e2 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 MB/s Performing way below expectations (0^th percentile)	1.08% Terrible	Read 5.2 Write 5 Mixed 5 SusWrite 0.1 5% 3.83 MB/s	4K Read 0 4K Write 0.1 4K Mixed 0.1 7% 0.07 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 1.08% Great: 53%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown NT2GC64B88B0NS-CG NT4GC64B8HB0NS-CG 6GB 137 User benchmarks, average bench 24% 1066, 1066 MHz 2048, 4096 MB Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile)	18.5% Very poor	MC Read 5.9 MC Write 5.3 MC Mixed 7.6 18% 6.27 GB/s	SC Read 4.8 SC Write 4.5 SC Mixed 5.4 14% 4.9 GB/s	Latency 145 28% 145 ns
Poor: 19% ↑ This bench: 18.5% Great: 31%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical ESPRIMO Q9000 Builds (Compare 9 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 40%

Speed boat

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

System: Fujitsu ESPRIMO Q9000

CPU
Core i5 M 520Intel $70Bench 40%, 23,644 samples	5x
Core i5 M 560Intel $65Bench 41%, 10,722 samples	2x
Core i3 M 370Intel $167Bench 39%, 23,407 samples	1x

GPU
HD Graphics (Arrandale 0.667/0.766 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 99,513 samples	9x

SSD
Extreme 120GBSanDisk $160Bench 69%, 11,787 samples	2x
850 Evo 120GBSamsung $80Bench 96%, 69,224 samples	1x
SD8SB8U128G1001 128GBSandiskBench 72%, 1,067 samples	1x

RAM
M471B5673FH0-CH9 2x2GBSamsungBench 29%, 5,297 samples	2x
M471B5673FH0-CF8 2x2GBSamsungBench 25%, 6,000 samples	1x
16KTF51264HZ-1G6M1 2x4GBMicronBench 50%, 5,422 samples	1x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 20% - Poor

Total price: $230

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159	Nvidia RTX 4060 $280	WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-13600K $210	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389	WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-12400F $111	Nvidia RTX 4070 $500	Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370