Asus ROG STRIX X570-F GAMING

Performance Results


Gaming 39% Jet ski	Desktop 99% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 37% Jet ski


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (30th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 70 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 96.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics	33.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	100% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Motherboard	Asus ROG STRIX X570-F GAMING (all builds)
Memory	8.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit väriä
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20210809
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Mar 28 '22 at 18:51
Run Duration	279 Seconds
Run User	FIN-User
Background CPU	2%

PC Performing below expectations (30^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 5 5600X-$142 383,420 User benchmarks, average bench 96% AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.5 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (59^th percentile)	96.6% Outstanding	Memory 84.4 1-Core 169 2-Core 315 102% 190 Pts	4-Core 584 8-Core 912 92% 748 Pts	64-Core 1,108 69% 1,108 Pts
Poor: 83% ↑ This bench: 96.6% Great: 107%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 960-$198 440,282 User benchmarks, average bench 33% MSI(1462 3202) CLim: 1405 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 456.71 Performing below potential (65^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	33.2% Below average	Lighting 42.6 Reflection 44.4 Parallax 39.8 35% 42.3 fps	MRender 37.8 Gravity 39.3 Splatting 34.6 30% 37.2 fps
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 33.2% Great: 36%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$130 602,853 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 586GB free (System drive) Firmware: RVT03B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 306 264 378 426 428 430 MB/s Performing below expectations (21^st percentile)	100% Outstanding	Read 501 Write 437 Mixed 318 SusWrite 372 91% 407 MB/s	4K Read 32.4 4K Write 95.3 4K Mixed 44.6 157% 57.4 MB/s	DQ Read 222 DQ Write 186 DQ Mixed 184 143% 197 MB/s
Poor: 81% ↑ This bench: 100% Great: 133%
Seagate Barracuda 4TB (2017)-$79 179,101 User benchmarks, average bench 67% 1.5TB free Firmware: 0001 SusWrite @10s intervals: 128 130 126 131 130 132 MB/s Performing below expectations (23^rd percentile)	56.4% Above average	Read 67.2 Write 108 Mixed 72.3 SusWrite 129 69% 94.1 MB/s	4K Read 1.3 4K Write 0.5 4K Mixed 0 63% 0.6 MB/s
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 56.4% Great: 90%
Seagate Barracuda 4TB (2017)-$79 179,101 User benchmarks, average bench 67% 984GB free Firmware: 0001 SusWrite @10s intervals: 125 123 129 129 133 130 MB/s Performing below expectations (38^th percentile)	62.9% Good	Read 91 Write 129 Mixed 68 SusWrite 128 76% 104 MB/s	4K Read 1.4 4K Write 0.5 4K Mixed 0 68% 0.63 MB/s
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 62.9% Great: 90%
ST4000DM 004-2CV104 4TB 28 User benchmarks, average bench 32% 767GB free, PID null SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.3 4.7 5.1 4.9 5 4.9 MB/s Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	12.4% Very poor	Read 59.3 Write 65.9 Mixed 55 SusWrite 4.8 60% 46.2 MB/s	4K Read 1.1 4K Write 0.8 4K Mixed 0.3 42% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 12.4% Great: 61%
ASMT 2235 2TB 4 User benchmarks, average bench 43% 2TB free, PID 235c SusWrite @10s intervals: 130 133 132 132 132 131 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	54.2% Above average	Read 59.6 Write 131 Mixed 56.3 SusWrite 132 138% 94.6 MB/s	4K Read 1.1 4K Write 5.4 4K Mixed 0.7 212% 2.4 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 54.2% Great: 65%
ST4000DM 004-2CV104 4TB 199 User benchmarks, average bench 38% 400GB free, PID 0567 SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.3 4.6 4.3 4.6 4.7 4.8 MB/s Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile)	13.3% Very poor	Read 66.4 Write 81 Mixed 56.1 SusWrite 4.5 68% 52 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 0.8 4K Mixed 0.2 38% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 13.3% Great: 70%
ST4000DM 004-2CV104 4TB 28 User benchmarks, average bench 32% 1.5TB free, PID null SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.4 4.7 5.1 4.9 5 5.6 MB/s Performing way below expectations (18^th percentile)	17.4% Very poor	Read 93.9 Write 104 Mixed 57 SusWrite 4.9 82% 64.8 MB/s	4K Read 1.1 4K Write 0.8 4K Mixed 0.3 42% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 17.4% Great: 61%
ST4000DM 004-2CV104 4TB 28 User benchmarks, average bench 32% 553GB free, PID null SusWrite @10s intervals: 101 107 115 113 115 114 MB/s Performing above expectations (71^st percentile)	38% Below average	Read 75.5 Write 128 Mixed 60.3 SusWrite 111 133% 93.7 MB/s	4K Read 1.5 4K Write 0.8 4K Mixed 0.3 43% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 38% Great: 61%
ST4000DM 004-2CV104 4TB 28 User benchmarks, average bench 32% 290GB free, PID null SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.3 4.7 5.1 4.9 5 5.7 MB/s Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	12.2% Very poor	Read 58.2 Write 78.1 Mixed 53.8 SusWrite 4.9 65% 48.8 MB/s	4K Read 1.1 4K Write 0.8 4K Mixed 0.2 38% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 12.2% Great: 61%
ST4000DM 004-2CV104 4TB 199 User benchmarks, average bench 38% 1.5TB free, PID 0567 SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.4 4.5 4.3 4.6 4.7 4.8 MB/s Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	11.8% Very poor	Read 57.3 Write 88.7 Mixed 60 SusWrite 4.5 71% 52.6 MB/s	4K Read 1.4 4K Write 0.7 4K Mixed 0.3 39% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 11.8% Great: 70%
ST4000DM 004-2CV104 4TB 199 User benchmarks, average bench 38% 1TB free, PID 0567 SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.4 4.5 4.3 4.6 4.7 4.8 MB/s Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	10.9% Very poor	Read 49.2 Write 94.9 Mixed 53.5 SusWrite 4.5 70% 50.5 MB/s	4K Read 1.2 4K Write 0.8 4K Mixed 0.3 42% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 10.9% Great: 70%
ST4000DM 004-2CV104 4TB 199 User benchmarks, average bench 38% 2TB free, PID 0567 SusWrite @10s intervals: 101 106 97 105 107 110 MB/s Performing as expected (49^th percentile)	34.1% Below average	Read 58.7 Write 67.8 Mixed 69.1 SusWrite 104 107% 74.9 MB/s	4K Read 1.7 4K Write 0.8 4K Mixed 0.3 44% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 34.1% Great: 70%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Crucial BL8G32C16U4BL.8FE 2x8GB 572 User benchmarks, average bench 92% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz Performing as expected (41^st percentile)	87.8% Excellent	MC Read 36.9 MC Write 23.9 MC Mixed 33.1 89% 31.3 GB/s	SC Read 25.9 SC Write 23.6 SC Mixed 33.6 79% 27.7 GB/s	Latency 72.8 55% 72.8 ns
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 87.8% Great: 113%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical ROG STRIX X570-F GAMING Builds (Compare 4,577 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 184%

UFO

Desktop 104%

UFO

Workstation 201%

UFO

Motherboard: Asus ROG STRIX X570-F GAMING

CPU
Ryzen 9 5900XAMD $260Bench 99%, 60,132 samples	1,029x
Ryzen 7 5800XAMD $170Bench 98%, 128,080 samples	740x
Ryzen 9 3900XAMD $395Bench 88%, 197,342 samples	560x

GPU
RTX 3080Nvidia $910Bench 187%, 424,051 samples	560x
RTX 3080-TiNvidia $660Bench 204%, 155,335 samples	368x
RTX 3070Nvidia $400Bench 148%, 619,642 samples	338x

SSD
980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $107Bench 394%, 276,089 samples	416x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $98Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	352x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 276%, 367,854 samples	227x

RAM
F4 DDR4 3600 C16 2x16GBG.SKILLBench 104%, 73,741 samples	218x
Vengeance RGB PRO DDR4 3600 C18 2x8GBCorsair $82Bench 95%, 56,114 samples	127x
Vengeance RGB PRO DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $56Bench 85%, 346,786 samples	109x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 67% - Good

Total price: $1,277

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16