ADD TO PC
BUILD

Zoostorm 7200-5071C

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (48th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 52 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 48.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Boot Drive	56.8% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Run History

2 years ago, 2 years ago.

System	Zoostorm 7200-5071C (all builds)
Motherboard	MSI A78M-E35 V2 (MS-7721)
Memory	11.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20150420
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Mar 27 '22 at 18:29
Run Duration	163 Seconds
Run User	GBR-User
Background CPU	7%

PC Performing as expected (48^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD A10-7850K APU (2014 D.Ka)-$135 19,875 User benchmarks, average bench 45% P0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.7 GHz Performing above expectations (70^th percentile)	48.1% Average	Memory 68.7 1-Core 61.2 2-Core 105 49% 78.3 Pts	4-Core 162 8-Core 156 22% 159 Pts	64-Core 164 10% 164 Pts
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 48.1% Great: 54%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston SUV300S37A240G 240GB 75 User benchmarks, average bench 65% 133GB free (System drive) Firmware: SAFM SusWrite @10s intervals: 75 81 80 72 47 50 MB/s Performing below potential (27^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	56.8% Above average	Read 269 Write 115 Mixed 197 SusWrite 67.5 36% 162 MB/s	4K Read 24.3 4K Write 82.1 4K Mixed 24 111% 43.5 MB/s	DQ Read 187 DQ Write 201 DQ Mixed 72.3 88% 154 MB/s
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 56.8% Great: 81%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$50 815,515 User benchmarks, average bench 88% 666GB free Firmware: CC27 SusWrite @10s intervals: 158 157 155 156 156 156 MB/s Performing as expected (51^st percentile)	91.7% Outstanding	Read 164 Write 114 Mixed 86.5 SusWrite 156 96% 130 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.6 4K Mixed 0.9 159% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 91.7% Great: 114%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$37 3,105,054 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 587GB free Firmware: 01.0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 172 173 172 173 173 173 MB/s Performing above expectations (82^nd percentile)	99.7% Outstanding	Read 174 Write 169 Mixed 136 SusWrite 173 120% 163 MB/s	4K Read 1.4 4K Write 2.7 4K Mixed 1.2 242% 1.77 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 99.7% Great: 109%
BUFFALO HD-PCFU3 2TB 82 User benchmarks, average bench 31% 990GB free, PID 0243 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 30 31 31 31 30 31 MB/s Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	16% Very poor	Read 32 Write 29.7 Mixed 20.8 SusWrite 30.5 38% 28.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 1.5 4K Mixed 0.6 73% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 16% Great: 42%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown CT102464BA160B.C16 Kingston 9905471-081.A00LF 16GB 4 User benchmarks, average bench 55% 1600, 1600 MHz 8192, 8192 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	38.1% Below average	MC Read 16.2 MC Write 8.7 MC Mixed 16.2 39% 13.7 GB/s	SC Read 8.2 SC Write 7.8 SC Mixed 11.3 26% 9.1 GB/s	Latency 104 38% 104 ns
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 38.1% Great: 62%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

The Best.

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $79	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission

Today's hottest

Amazon Ebay

deals

CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD

Build

Test

EFps

Can You Run It?

►
YouTube
*NEW*

About • User Guide • FAQs • Email • Privacy • Developer • YouTube Feedback