Today's hottest deals

Asus PRIME H610M-K D4

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 78%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 105%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 74%
Battleship
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (45th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 55 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 100%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics77.2% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive237% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
MotherboardAsus PRIME H610M-K D4  (all builds)
Memory11.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit renk
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20211102
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateMar 25 '22 at 12:31
Run Duration210 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU6%

 PC Performing as expected (45th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-12400F-$112
LGA1700, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
100% Outstanding
Memory 84.2
1-Core 185
2-Core 358
111% 209 Pts
4-Core 622
8-Core 978
99% 800 Pts
64-Core 1,247
77% 1,247 Pts
Poor: 92%
This bench: 100%
Great: 105%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3050-$243
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 512.15
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
77.2% Very good
Lighting 105
Reflection 86
Parallax 90.9
86% 94.1 fps
MRender 86.2
Gravity 73
Splatting 65.9
60% 75 fps
Poor: 68%
This bench: 77.2%
Great: 78%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kioxia-exceria SSD 500GB
409GB free (System drive)
Firmware: ECFA15.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1475 1312 846 858 850 862 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
237% Outstanding
Read 1,081
Write 1,541
Mixed 1254
SusWrite 1,034
278% 1,227 MB/s
4K Read 37.2
4K Write 193
4K Mixed 66
243% 98.7 MB/s
DQ Read 1334
DQ Write 1,188
DQ Mixed 1,309
968% 1,277 MB/s
Poor: 110%
This bench: 237%
Great: 240%
WD Green 2TB (2011)-$46
762GB free
Firmware: 51.0AB51
SusWrite @10s intervals: 53 53 53 53 53 53 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
29% Poor
Read 47.6
Write 52.4
Mixed 37.2
SusWrite 52.8
35% 47.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.5
122% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 29%
Great: 67%
WD Red 2TB (2012)-$76
2TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 158 156 159 156 159 157 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
95% Outstanding
Read 173
Write 157
Mixed 79.3
SusWrite 158
104% 142 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 0.9
184% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 45%
This bench: 95%
Great: 86%
WDC WD20 EFRX-68AX9N0 2TB
2TB free, PID 0551
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1.6 9.5 9.5 8.9 9.5 15 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
16.1% Very poor
Read 40.7
Write 38.7
Mixed 30.4
SusWrite 9.1
38% 29.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 0.9
122% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 16.1%
Great: 53%
ST2000DL 003-9VT166 2TB
2TB free, PID 0551
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 14 10 9.4 9 9.3 10 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
11.2% Very poor
Read 39.6
Write 38.4
Mixed 29.4
SusWrite 10.3
38% 29.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.8
64% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 11.2%
Great: 48%
WDC WD10 EADS-00M2B0 1TB
931GB free, PID 0551
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 14 10 9.5 9 9.2 9.4 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
13.6% Very poor
Read 34.9
Write 37.6
Mixed 31.7
SusWrite 10.2
38% 28.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.7
94% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 13.6%
Great: 40%
WDC WD10 EADS-00M2B0 1TB
931GB free, PID 0551
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 14 10 9.5 9 9.3 9.4 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
14.1% Very poor
Read 40.4
Write 38.1
Mixed 31.9
SusWrite 10.2
39% 30.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.7
91% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 14.1%
Great: 40%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial BL16G32C16U4B.M16FE1 1x16GB
1 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 2667 MHz clocked @ 2666 MHz
Performing below potential (51st percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
52.1% Above average
MC Read 18
MC Write 17.9
MC Mixed 16.1
50% 17.3 GB/s
SC Read 18.6
SC Write 18.8
SC Mixed 18.7
53% 18.7 GB/s
Latency 73.1
55% 73.1 ns
Poor: 41%
This bench: 52.1%
Great: 62%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical PRIME H610M-K D4 Builds (Compare 4,016 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 101%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 103%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 95%
Nuclear submarine

Motherboard: Asus PRIME H610M-K D4

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 103% - Outstanding Total price: $368
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $248Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback