Today's hottest deals

Razer Blade Stealth

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 102%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 83%
Aircraft carrier
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 65.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics155% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive242% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Very high background CPU (32%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU. CPU throttled at 89% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
Run History
SystemRazer Blade Stealth  (all builds)
MotherboardRazer LY310
Memory9.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, , 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20190608
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 21 '22 at 04:17
Run Duration202 Seconds
Run User JPN-User
Background CPU 32%
CPU Throttled 89%

 PC Performing as expected (49th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-8565U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
65.3% Good
Memory 72
1-Core 124
2-Core 187
73% 128 Pts
4-Core 322
8-Core 427
48% 375 Pts
64-Core 434
27% 434 Pts
Poor: 29%
This bench: 65.3%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3070-Ti-$499
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 4750 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 511.79
Performing below potential (31st percentile) - GPU OC Guide
155% Outstanding
Lighting 226
Reflection 209
Parallax 218
184% 218 fps
MRender 234
Gravity 160
Splatting 128
137% 174 fps
Poor: 139%
This bench: 155%
Great: 170%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Green SN350 2TB
1TB free (System drive)
Firmware: 33006000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1249 1253 1268 1282 1296 1299 MB/s
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
242% Outstanding
Read 1,571
Write 1,342
Mixed 1,391
SusWrite 1,275
314% 1,395 MB/s
4K Read 51.2
4K Write 136
4K Mixed 61.8
229% 83 MB/s
DQ Read 915
DQ Write 500
DQ Mixed 664
506% 693 MB/s
Poor: 167%
This bench: 242%
Great: 390%
WD Elements 2621 2TB
1.5TB free, PID 2621
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 97 102 102 101 93 94 MB/s
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
50.5% Above average
Read 108
Write 97.1
Mixed 62.3
SusWrite 98.1
122% 91.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 4.3
4K Mixed 0.3
158% 1.7 MB/s
Poor: 18%
This bench: 50.5%
Great: 62%
External USB3.0 4TB
680GB free, PID 0578
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4 4.6 3.6 3.4 1.4 3.4 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
26.4% Poor
Read 94.5
Write 132
Mixed 87.8
SusWrite 3.4
105% 79.3 MB/s
4K Read 2.3
4K Write 3.7
4K Mixed 0.6
155% 2.2 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 26.4%
Great: 85%
External USB3.0 250GB
31GB free, PID 0578
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 72 75 76 75 74 71 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
109% Outstanding
Read 108
Write 106
Mixed 106
SusWrite 73.7
133% 98.4 MB/s
4K Read 18.3
4K Write 23.7
4K Mixed 19.3
1,530% 20.4 MB/s
DQ Read 22.1
DQ Write 37.6
DQ Mixed 27
2,279% 28.9 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 109%
Great: 109%
External USB3.0 2TB
1TB free, PID 0578
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 70 74 74 74 73 71 MB/s
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
33.4% Below average
Read 69.4
Write 71.6
Mixed 60.6
SusWrite 72.5
94% 68.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 0.7
108% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 33.4%
Great: 118%
External USB3.0 3TB
913GB free, PID 0578
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2.3 2.2 2.4 1.7 1.3 21 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
18.6% Very poor
Read 87.7
Write 83
Mixed 45.4
SusWrite 5.2
68% 55.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.7
77% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 7%
This bench: 18.6%
Great: 49%
WD Elements SE 25FF 4TB
1TB free, PID 25ff
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 77 77 77 76 76 77 MB/s
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
47.6% Average
Read 86.1
Write 85.5
Mixed 66.1
SusWrite 76.7
106% 78.6 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 5.9
4K Mixed 0.6
226% 2.57 MB/s
Poor: 20%
This bench: 47.6%
Great: 62%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung K4EBE304EB-EGCG 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB Row of chips LPDDR3 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing as expected (60th percentile)
67.4% Good
MC Read 25.3
MC Write 26.5
MC Mixed 21.8
70% 24.5 GB/s
SC Read 12.2
SC Write 26.1
SC Mixed 18.8
54% 19 GB/s
Latency 96.9
41% 96.9 ns
Poor: 50%
This bench: 67.4%
Great: 71%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Blade Stealth Builds (Compare 707 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk

System: Razer Blade Stealth

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $291WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $390WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $85
Intel Core i5-13600K $215Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback