Foxconn P4M900-8237A

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 8%
Tree trunk
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (32nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 68 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 34.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics2.98% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
MemoryThe RAM on this system should be upgraded to at least 2GB although on 32bit systems 1GB will suffice as a bare minimum.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 11 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardFoxconn P4M900-8237A  (all builds)
Memory0.2 GB free of 1 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20070129
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateFeb 27 '22 at 11:37
Run Duration240 Seconds
Run User CHE-User
Background CPU 12%

 PC Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core2 6600-$90
Socket 775, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
34.3% Below average
Memory 58.4
1-Core 31.5
2-Core 62.3
34% 50.7 Pts
4-Core 62.6
8-Core 62.7
8% 62.7 Pts
64-Core 62.5
4% 62.5 Pts
Poor: 25%
This bench: 34.3%
Great: 43%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro 600
Nvidia(10DE 0835) 1GB
CLim: 640 MHz, MLim: 400 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 377.83
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
2.98% Terrible
Lighting 3.5
Reflection 5.6
Parallax 1.2
3% 3.43 fps
MRender 5.3
Gravity 4
Splatting 3
3% 4.1 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 2.98%
Great: 3%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate Momentus Thin 5400.9 2.5" 500GB-$21
425GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0002SDM1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 14 15 21 34 36 21 MB/s
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
35.8% Below average
Read 102
Write 63
Mixed 37.8
SusWrite 23.4
41% 56.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 0.7
4K Mixed 0.5
85% 0.53 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 35.8%
Great: 61%
WD Elements SE 25FF 4TB
3TB free, PID 25ff
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 25 25 25 24 24 24 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
20.5% Poor
Read 31.5
Write 24.3
Mixed 24.5
SusWrite 24.5
35% 26.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 3.4
4K Mixed 0.8
145% 1.6 MB/s
Poor: 20%
This bench: 20.5%
Great: 62%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 1x1GB
1 of 2 slots used
1GB DIMM DDR2
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
10.5% Very poor
MC Read 3.7
MC Write 2.8
MC Mixed 3
9% 3.17 GB/s
SC Read 2.8
SC Write 4.1
SC Mixed 0
7% 2.3 GB/s
Latency 132
30% 132 ns
Poor: 4%
This bench: 10.5%
Great: 52%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P4M900-8237A Builds (Compare 8 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 38%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Foxconn P4M900-8237A

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 55% - Above average Total price: $100
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $234Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback