Today's hottest deals

QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 43%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 36%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (62nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 38 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 58.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics59% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive179% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory20GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 20GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Sub-optimal background CPU (19%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemQEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009)  (all builds)
Motherboard
Memory12.5 GB free of 19.9961 GB @ 0 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit färger
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20150206
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 14 '22 at 23:47
Run Duration179 Seconds
Run User SWE-User
Background CPU 19%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2950X 16-Core
CPU 0, 4 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
58.3% Above average
Memory 53.7
1-Core 77.2
2-Core 221
60% 117 Pts
4-Core 365
8-Core 354
48% 359 Pts
64-Core 390
24% 390 Pts
Poor: 48%
This bench: 58.3%
Great: 78%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117
CLim: 2012 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 511.79
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
59% Above average
Lighting 72.7
Reflection 80
Parallax 71.6
59% 74.8 fps
MRender 68.4
Gravity 72.5
Splatting 72.4
58% 71.1 fps
Poor: 51%
This bench: 59%
Great: 60%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Corsair Force NVMe PCIe M.2 480GB
395GB free (System drive)
Firmware: ECFM22.6 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1652 593 374 379 386 391 MB/s
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
179% Outstanding
Read 1,241
Write 1,156
Mixed 1,289
SusWrite 629
243% 1,079 MB/s
4K Read 41.1
4K Write 139
4K Mixed 67.7
223% 82.7 MB/s
DQ Read 614
DQ Write 332
DQ Mixed 480
355% 476 MB/s
Poor: 125%
This bench: 179%
Great: 262%
Red Hat VirtIO 107GB
87GB free
Firmware: 0001
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,669
Write 1,967
Mixed 2,204
1,716% 2,280 MB/s
4K Read 63.4
4K Write 55.3
4K Mixed 57.1
10,010% 58.6 MB/s
DQ Read 448
DQ Write 313
DQ Mixed 220
2,496% 327 MB/s
Poor: 11% Great: 82%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
QEMU 19GB
0, 0 MHz
16384, 4092 MB
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
140% Outstanding
MC Read 43.7
MC Write 73.9
MC Mixed 52.6
162% 56.7 GB/s
SC Read 14.3
SC Write 29.8
SC Mixed 21
62% 21.7 GB/s
Latency 148
27% 148 ns
Poor: 39%
This bench: 140%
Great: 140%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009) Builds (Compare 621 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 83%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 74%
Battleship

System: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 124% - Outstanding Total price: $237
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback