Today's hottest deals

QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009)

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (61st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 39 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 78.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics24.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory23.9GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 23.9GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (30%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
SystemQEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009)  (all builds)
Motherboard
Memory21.2 GB free of 23.9258 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150206
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 19 '21 at 22:45
Run Duration122 Seconds
Run User SWE-User
Background CPU 30%

 PC Performing above expectations (61st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2950X 16-Core
CPU 0, 2 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
78.5% Very good
Memory 60.7
1-Core 131
2-Core 257
79% 150 Pts
4-Core 514
8-Core 1,016
90% 765 Pts
64-Core 1,015
63% 1,015 Pts
Poor: 48%
This bench: 78.5%
Great: 78%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD FirePro W8000
AMD(1002 0B2A) 3GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.300.1025.1001
Performing below potential (4th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
24.6% Poor
Lighting 31.3
Reflection 4.6
Parallax 47.2
26% 27.7 fps
MRender 24
Gravity 37.4
Splatting 24
23% 28.5 fps
Poor: 26%
This bench: 24.6%
Great: 31%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Qemu HARDDISK 161GB
102GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2.5+
SusWrite @10s intervals: 47 50 50 50 41 38 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 24% Great: 84%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
QEMU 23GB
0, 0 MHz
16384, 8116 MB
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
136% Outstanding
MC Read 55.6
MC Write 56.8
MC Mixed 51.3
156% 54.6 GB/s
SC Read 14.9
SC Write 31.5
SC Mixed 23.5
67% 23.3 GB/s
Latency 126
32% 126 ns
Poor: 37%
This bench: 136%
Great: 138%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009) Builds (Compare 621 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 83%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 74%
Battleship

System: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 124% - Outstanding Total price: $237
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback