Today's hottest deals

QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009)

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (41st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 59 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 79.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics98.5% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (19%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemQEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009)  (all builds)
Motherboard
Memory6 GB free of 8 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140401
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 14 '22 at 19:16
Run Duration127 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU 19%

 PC Performing as expected (41st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-9400F
CPU 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 2.9 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
79.4% Very good
Memory 80.2
1-Core 121
2-Core 241
82% 147 Pts
4-Core 451
8-Core 465
61% 458 Pts
64-Core 474
29% 474 Pts
Poor: 43%
This bench: 79.4%
Great: 87%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro P6000
Nvidia(10DE 11E8) 1GB
Ram: 1GB, Driver: 460.79
Performing below potential (5th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
98.5% Outstanding
Lighting 124
Reflection 132
Parallax 124
101% 127 fps
MRender 97.7
Gravity 131
Splatting 112
93% 114 fps
Poor: 98%
This bench: 98.5%
Great: 128%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Qemu HARDDISK 54GB
27GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2.5+
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1894
Write 498
Mixed 1286
269% 1,226 MB/s
4K Read 37.7
4K Write 37.7
4K Mixed 29.5
115% 35 MB/s
DQ Read 101
DQ Write 84.4
DQ Mixed 98.7
72% 94.6 MB/s
Poor: 22% Great: 65%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
QEMU 1x8GB
1 of 1 slots used
8GB DIMM RAM
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
74.9% Very good
MC Read 29.6
MC Write 26.3
MC Mixed 24.3
76% 26.7 GB/s
SC Read 17.4
SC Write 27.3
SC Mixed 23.8
65% 22.8 GB/s
Latency 80.1
50% 80.1 ns
Poor: 30%
This bench: 74.9%
Great: 145%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009) Builds (Compare 621 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 83%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 74%
Battleship

System: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 124% - Outstanding Total price: $237
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $218Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback