Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (62nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 38 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 56.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Boot Drive	65.1% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	The RAM on this system should be upgraded to at least 2GB although on 32bit systems 1GB will suffice as a bare minimum.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

System	QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996) (all builds)
Motherboard
Memory	0.3 GB free of 1 GB @ 0 GHz
Display	1024 x 768 - 32 Bit couleurs
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20140401
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Nov 30 '17 at 12:43
Run Duration	63 Seconds
Run User	FRA-User
Background CPU	10%

PC Performing above expectations (62^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon E31260L 3 User benchmarks, average bench 50% CPU 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.4 GHz (avg) Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	56.9% Above average	Memory 69.7 1-Core 77.3 2-Core 158 59% 101 Pts	4-Core 256 8-Core 261 34% 258 Pts	64-Core 264 16% 264 Pts
Poor: 41% ↑ This bench: 56.9% Great: 57%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Qemu HARDDISK 54GB 93 User benchmarks, average bench 41% 37GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2.2.0 Max speed: UDMA 100 100 MB/s Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (03) Spinup time 100 100 16 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 100 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 1 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 69 69 522125343	65.1% Good	Read 541 Write 489 Mixed 524 116% 518 MB/s	4K Read 17 4K Write 16.4 4K Mixed 7.37 44% 13.6 MB/s	DQ Read 14.4 DQ Write 23.4 DQ Mixed 13.4 12% 17.1 MB/s
Poor: 22% ↑ This bench: 65.1% Great: 65%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
QEMU 1x1GB 247 User benchmarks, average bench 47% 1 of 1 slots used 1GB DIMM RAM Performing below expectations (29^th percentile)	22.8% Poor	MC Read 8 MC Write 8.4 MC Mixed 6.3 22% 7.57 GB/s	SC Read 7.5 SC Write 8.8 SC Mixed 1.6 17% 5.97 GB/s	Latency 102 39% 102 ns
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 22.8% Great: 116%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 124%

UFO

Desktop 103%

UFO

Workstation 127%

UFO

CPU
Gen Intel Core i7-12700K12thBench 99%, 67 samples	5x
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X 24-CoreAMDBench 85%, 74 samples	4x
Ryzen 7 3700X 8-CoreAMDBench 76%, 455 samples	4x

SSD
Force NVMe PCIe M.2 960GBCorsairBench 230%, 32,020 samples	4x
SM841 mSATA 256GBSamsungBench 79%, 1,284 samples	3x
HARDDISK 86GBQemuBench 42%, 75 samples	3x

Value: 60% - Good

Total price: $485

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16