Today's hottest deals

Dell OptiPlex 3010

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 39%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (25th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 75 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 38.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics1.91% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemDell OptiPlex 3010
MotherboardDell OptiPlex 3010  (all builds)
Memory3.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20121207
Uptime2.9 Days
Run DateMar 11 '22 at 19:12
Run Duration248 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing below expectations (25th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-3220-$92
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
38.2% Below average
Memory 52.5
1-Core 72.3
2-Core 138
50% 87.4 Pts
4-Core 140
8-Core 142
19% 141 Pts
64-Core 130
8% 130 Pts
Poor: 38%
This bench: 38.2%
Great: 62%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 610
PNY(196E 104A) 1GB
CLim: 810 MHz, MLim: 267 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 391.35
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
1.91% Terrible
Lighting 2.4
Reflection 3.4
Parallax 0.4
2% 2.07 fps
MRender 2.5
Gravity 2.3
Splatting 2
2% 2.27 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 1.91%
Great: 2%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate ST3320418AS 320GB-$54
57GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HP22
SusWrite @10s intervals: 34 27 48 60 55 77 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
32.9% Below average
Read 64.5
Write 77.8
Mixed 41.9
SusWrite 50
43% 58.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.8
130% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 21%
This bench: 32.9%
Great: 58%
General UDisk 2TB
2TB free, PID 04d2
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 7.7 6.6 6.6 6.3 6.6 6.7 MB/s
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
6.79% Terrible
Read 28.1
Write 21
Mixed 22.6
SusWrite 6.7
25% 19.6 MB/s
4K Read 5.3
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0.9
50% 2.07 MB/s
Poor: 7%
This bench: 6.79%
Great: 11%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial CT51264BD1339.M16F 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
40.7% Average
MC Read 14.6
MC Write 15.4
MC Mixed 14.5
42% 14.8 GB/s
SC Read 12.3
SC Write 13.7
SC Mixed 7.3
32% 11.1 GB/s
Latency 152
26% 152 ns
Poor: 26%
This bench: 40.7%
Great: 53%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical OptiPlex 3010 Builds (Compare 4,460 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Dell OptiPlex 3010

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 75% - Very good Total price: $84
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback