Today's hottest deals

Asrock 970M Pro3

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 20%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 67%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 16%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (34th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 66 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 58.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics31.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive72.1% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsrock 970M Pro3  (all builds)
Memory4.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150121
Uptime13.9 Days
Run DateAug 29 '18 at 18:52
Run Duration149 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU7%
Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (34th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-6350 Six-Core-$100
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 3 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 3.9 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
58.2% Above average
Memory 81.8
1-Core 66.4
2-Core 125
56% 91.2 Pts
4-Core 196
8-Core 236
28% 216 Pts
64-Core 221
14% 221 Pts
Poor: 48%
This bench: 58.2%
Great: 66%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 399.7
Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)
31.2% Below average
Lighting 38.8
Reflection 30.1
Parallax 36.6
32% 35.2 fps
MRender 38.4
Gravity 37.8
Splatting 35.7
30% 37.3 fps
Poor: 27%
This bench: 31.2%
Great: 33%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SanDisk Ultra Plus 128GB-$75
62GB free (System drive)
Firmware: X2316RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 185 180 171 184 173 177 MB/s
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
72.1% Very good
Read 462
Write 202
Mixed 208
SusWrite 178
58% 262 MB/s
4K Read 26.9
4K Write 60.4
4K Mixed 29.1
110% 38.8 MB/s
DQ Read 230
DQ Write 177
DQ Mixed 118
112% 175 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 72.1%
Great: 91%
SanDisk Ultra II 480GB-$130
143GB free
Firmware: X31200RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 163 163 165 164 154 152 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
62.1% Good
Read 385
Write 351
Mixed 240
SusWrite 160
64% 284 MB/s
4K Read 24.1
4K Write 60
4K Mixed 32.5
110% 38.9 MB/s
DQ Read 28.7
DQ Write 90.2
DQ Mixed 40
36% 53 MB/s
Poor: 59%
This bench: 62.1%
Great: 108%
Seagate Desktop SSHD 2TB-$90
716GB free
Firmware: CC41
SusWrite @10s intervals: 163 163 165 164 154 152 MB/s
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
78.3% Very good
Read 112
Write 139
Mixed 26.2
SusWrite 160
79% 109 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 5.2
4K Mixed 2.1
376% 2.8 MB/s
Poor: 43%
This bench: 78.3%
Great: 108%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial CT51264BD1339.M16F 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz clocked @ 667 MHz
Performing below potential (6th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
25.6% Poor
MC Read 8.7
MC Write 8.4
MC Mixed 7.7
24% 8.27 GB/s
SC Read 6.8
SC Write 5.7
SC Mixed 6.8
18% 6.43 GB/s
Latency 77.3
52% 77.3 ns
Poor: 26%
This bench: 25.6%
Great: 53%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 970M Pro3 Builds (Compare 863 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 22%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 18%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asrock 970M Pro3

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 87% - Excellent Total price: $169
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback