To Be Filled By O.E.M.

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 73%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 68%
Battle cruiser
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics94.7% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive29% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardTo Be Filled By O.E.M.  (all builds)
Memory12.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1360 x 768 - 32 Bit farver
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191029
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 05 '22 at 13:36
Run Duration311 Seconds
Run User SWE-User
Background CPU6%
Watch Gameplay: 2060 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (46th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5-2689 0
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
73% Very good
Memory 82.1
1-Core 92.3
2-Core 181
69% 118 Pts
4-Core 344
8-Core 644
59% 494 Pts
64-Core 864
54% 864 Pts
Poor: 60%
This bench: 73%
Great: 77%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2060-$296
Asus(1043 86F0) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2235 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 466.77
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
94.7% Outstanding
Lighting 119
Reflection 113
Parallax 115
97% 116 fps
MRender 133
Gravity 106
Splatting 97.8
90% 112 fps
Poor: 80%
This bench: 94.7%
Great: 97%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SSD 256GB 256GB
61GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S0423B0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 12 361 5.1 4.4 4.6 56 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
29% Poor
Read 478
Write 386
Mixed 10.4
SusWrite 73.8
52% 237 MB/s
4K Read 12.3
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.4
20% 4.97 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 29%
Great: 166%
Kingston SKC6001024G 1TB
630GB free
Firmware: S4300101
SusWrite @10s intervals: 238 238 229 229 228 224 MB/s
Performing below potential (5th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
72.6% Very good
Read 256
Write 245
Mixed 234
SusWrite 231
54% 241 MB/s
4K Read 28.6
4K Write 54.2
4K Mixed 40.6
124% 41.1 MB/s
DQ Read 207
DQ Write 199
DQ Mixed 184
144% 197 MB/s
Poor: 74%
This bench: 72.6%
Great: 131%
Vaseky V800/240G 240GB
100GB free
Firmware: V8341c75
SusWrite @10s intervals: 184 185 185 185 185 182 MB/s
Performing below potential (23rd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
42.6% Average
Read 256
Write 179
Mixed 186
SusWrite 184
45% 201 MB/s
4K Read 18.4
4K Write 18.5
4K Mixed 16.9
59% 17.9 MB/s
DQ Read 95.7
DQ Write 27.8
DQ Mixed 54.2
42% 59.2 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 42.6%
Great: 93%
Intenso External USB 3.0 2TB
1TB free
Firmware: 1201
SusWrite @10s intervals: 29 28 30 30 30 30 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
18.2% Very poor
Read 33.3
Write 28.5
Mixed 28.1
SusWrite 29.5
22% 29.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.8
145% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 18.2%
Great: 77%
ST350041 3AS 500GB
374GB free, PID 2773
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 86 85 86 82 82 81 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
43.4% Average
Read 130
Write 128
Mixed 74.8
SusWrite 83.6
137% 104 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 1
105% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 43.4%
Great: 43%
WD My Passport 2599 2TB
1TB free, PID 2599
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 98 98 97 97 94 98 MB/s
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
38.7% Below average
Read 81.8
Write 82.6
Mixed 50.1
SusWrite 97.1
106% 77.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.9
94% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 38.7%
Great: 45%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 9965447-003.A 9965447-018.A 9965447-028.A 9965447-028.A 16GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
84.8% Excellent
MC Read 34.8
MC Write 33.5
MC Mixed 31.2
95% 33.2 GB/s
SC Read 14.6
SC Write 12.5
SC Mixed 11.8
37% 13 GB/s
Latency 76.8
52% 76.8 ns
Poor: 85%
This bench: 84.8%
Great: 85%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Be Filled By O.E.M. Builds (Compare 5,598 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 58%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: To Be Filled By O.E.M.

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 72% - Very good Total price: $87
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback