To Be Filled By O.E.M.

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 26%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 25%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (23rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 77 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics25.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive29.9% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardTo Be Filled By O.E.M.  (all builds)
Memory10.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1360 x 768 - 32 Bit farver
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191029
Uptime5 Days
Run DateNov 14 '21 at 21:16
Run Duration225 Seconds
Run User SWE-User
Background CPU8%
Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5-2689 0
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
73.9% Very good
Memory 83.1
1-Core 93.9
2-Core 174
69% 117 Pts
4-Core 348
8-Core 696
62% 522 Pts
64-Core 889
55% 889 Pts
Poor: 60%
This bench: 73.9%
Great: 77%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
Asus(1043 862A) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 466.77
Performing below potential (2nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
25.9% Poor
Lighting 36.6
Reflection 41
Parallax 39
30% 38.9 fps
MRender 37.9
Gravity 38.5
Splatting 0.1
18% 25.5 fps
Poor: 27%
This bench: 25.9%
Great: 33%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SSD 256GB 256GB
54GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S0423B0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2.1 265 2.4 2.5 5.2 91 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
29.9% Poor
Read 463
Write 364
Mixed 335
SusWrite 61.3
68% 306 MB/s
4K Read 18.3
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.2
29% 6.63 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 29.9%
Great: 166%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 500GB-$32
230GB free
Firmware: JC66
SusWrite @10s intervals: 75 76 76 77 76 76 MB/s
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
48.7% Average
Read 93.5
Write 88.7
Mixed 60.9
SusWrite 76
59% 79.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.9
158% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 48.7%
Great: 70%
Intenso External USB 3.0 2TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: 1201
SusWrite @10s intervals: 30 23 25 30 29 29 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
16.5% Very poor
Read 29.5
Write 29.4
Mixed 27.8
SusWrite 27.5
21% 28.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.6
121% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 16.5%
Great: 77%
WD My Passport 2599 2TB
1TB free, PID 2599
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 27 27 27 28 28 27 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
15.7% Very poor
Read 32.3
Write 25.8
Mixed 23.7
SusWrite 27.3
36% 27.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.7
80% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 15.7%
Great: 45%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 9965447-003.A 9965447-018.A 9965447-028.A 9965447-028.A 16GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
85.3% Excellent
MC Read 35.9
MC Write 33.2
MC Mixed 30.6
95% 33.2 GB/s
SC Read 16
SC Write 12.7
SC Mixed 12.4
39% 13.7 GB/s
Latency 75
53% 75 ns
Poor: 85%
This bench: 85.3%
Great: 85%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Be Filled By O.E.M. Builds (Compare 5,609 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 58%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: To Be Filled By O.E.M.

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 72% - Very good Total price: $87
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12600K $171Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i3-12100F $80Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback