Today's hottest deals

Alienware ASM100

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 16%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (86th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 14 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics18% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive83.4% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemAlienware ASM100  (all builds)
MotherboardDell 0J8H4R
Memory6 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150714
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 02 '22 at 04:05
Run Duration129 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4690S-$141
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
73.8% Very good
Memory 90.1
1-Core 105
2-Core 176
74% 124 Pts
4-Core 334
8-Core 333
45% 333 Pts
64-Core 306
19% 306 Pts
Poor: 57%
This bench: 73.8%
Great: 81%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GPU
Dell(1028 066A) 2GB
CLim: 1232 MHz, MLim: 1500 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 511.65
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
18% Very poor
Lighting 22.2
Reflection 18.9
Parallax 21.5
18% 20.9 fps
MRender 26.3
Gravity 23.7
Splatting 17.1
18% 22.4 fps
Poor: 14%
This bench: 18%
Great: 18%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SanDisk SSD Plus 120GB-$30
80GB free (System drive)
Firmware: U21010RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 274 365 369 381 378 389 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
83.4% Excellent
Read 478
Write 384
Mixed 261
SusWrite 359
83% 371 MB/s
4K Read 27.1
4K Write 82.7
4K Mixed 18.2
108% 42.7 MB/s
DQ Read 177
DQ Write 306
DQ Mixed 106
119% 196 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 83.4%
Great: 78%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 99U5428-018.A00LF 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
33.7% Below average
MC Read 11.1
MC Write 11.7
MC Mixed 9.5
31% 10.8 GB/s
SC Read 8.5
SC Write 12.1
SC Mixed 10.7
30% 10.4 GB/s
Latency 67.1
60% 67.1 ns
Poor: 14%
This bench: 33.7%
Great: 32%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ASM100 Builds (Compare 560 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 14%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 66%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk

System: Alienware ASM100

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 51% - Above average Total price: $130
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $298WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback