Today's hottest deals

Asus H170M-PLUS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 62%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 53%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (78th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 22 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 78.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics72.6% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive114% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus H170M-PLUS  (all builds)
Memory29.3 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180516
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 28 '22 at 01:32
Run Duration169 Seconds
Run User CHE-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing above expectations (78th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6700-$150
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.75 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
78.6% Very good
Memory 87.5
1-Core 79.9
2-Core 230
73% 133 Pts
4-Core 376
8-Core 614
60% 495 Pts
64-Core 615
38% 615 Pts
Poor: 60%
This bench: 78.6%
Great: 80%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX Titan X-$615
Nvidia(10DE 1132) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1392 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 511.79
Performing below potential (35th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
72.6% Very good
Lighting 90.8
Reflection 106
Parallax 95
74% 97.3 fps
MRender 89.2
Gravity 91
Splatting 78.5
70% 86.2 fps
Poor: 68%
This bench: 72.6%
Great: 83%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
170GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 316 304 305 305 304 304 MB/s
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
114% Outstanding
Read 453
Write 436
Mixed 356
SusWrite 306
87% 388 MB/s
4K Read 41.8
4K Write 121
4K Mixed 58.8
203% 73.9 MB/s
DQ Read 356
DQ Write 303
DQ Mixed 323
244% 327 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 114%
Great: 124%
Samsung 850 Evo 1TB-$234
931GB free
Firmware: EMT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 323 426 448 454 453 453 MB/s
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
118% Outstanding
Read 450
Write 427
Mixed 408
SusWrite 426
96% 428 MB/s
4K Read 39.2
4K Write 114
4K Mixed 55
190% 69.4 MB/s
DQ Read 356
DQ Write 302
DQ Mixed 326
245% 328 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 118%
Great: 133%
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$85
465GB free
Firmware: EMT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 322 425 444 450 449 449 MB/s
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
126% Outstanding
Read 451
Write 437
Mixed 379
SusWrite 423
95% 422 MB/s
4K Read 45.5
4K Write 119
4K Mixed 64.9
215% 76.3 MB/s
DQ Read 354
DQ Write 303
DQ Mixed 323
244% 327 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 126%
Great: 134%
Pc401 NVMe SK hynix 256GB
238GB free
Firmware: 80006E00 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 395 315 315 316 317 316 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
163% Outstanding
Read 1,138
Write 477
Mixed 1,098
SusWrite 329
169% 760 MB/s
4K Read 43.7
4K Write 143
4K Mixed 62.6
222% 83 MB/s
DQ Read 604
DQ Write 702
DQ Mixed 320
334% 542 MB/s
Poor: 68%
This bench: 163%
Great: 167%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378A1G43EB1-CPB Hynix HMA41GU6AFR8N-TF M378A1G43EB1-CPB Hynix HMA41GU6AFR8N-TF 32GB
2133, 2133, 2133, 2133 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
76.4% Very good
MC Read 27.2
MC Write 28.8
MC Mixed 24.2
76% 26.7 GB/s
SC Read 18.2
SC Write 30.9
SC Mixed 25.4
71% 24.8 GB/s
Latency 70
57% 70 ns
Poor: 65%
This bench: 76.4%
Great: 76%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H170M-PLUS Builds (Compare 1,366 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus H170M-PLUS - $296

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 54% - Above average Total price: $671
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback