Today's hottest deals

Asus H170M-PLUS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 29%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 25%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (61st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 39 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 81.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics26.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive105% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
MotherboardAsus H170M-PLUS  (all builds)
Memory28.5 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180516
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 08 '22 at 02:15
Run Duration150 Seconds
Run User CHE-User
Background CPU6%
Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (61st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6700-$150
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.75 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
81.5% Excellent
Memory 85.1
1-Core 111
2-Core 213
78% 136 Pts
4-Core 420
8-Core 616
65% 518 Pts
64-Core 616
38% 616 Pts
Poor: 60%
This bench: 81.5%
Great: 80%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
Asus(1043 85D6) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 456.71
Performing below potential (13th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
26.8% Poor
Lighting 33.8
Reflection 37.5
Parallax 34.9
28% 35.4 fps
MRender 34.8
Gravity 34.7
Splatting 25.3
25% 31.6 fps
Poor: 27%
This bench: 26.8%
Great: 33%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
116GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 301 251 287 289 288 290 MB/s
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
105% Outstanding
Read 453
Write 425
Mixed 314
SusWrite 284
83% 369 MB/s
4K Read 36.4
4K Write 90.4
4K Mixed 56.3
175% 61 MB/s
DQ Read 356
DQ Write 283
DQ Mixed 317
238% 318 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 105%
Great: 124%
Pc401 NVMe SK hynix 256GB
238GB free
Firmware: 80006E00 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 416 315 314 316 315 316 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
167% Outstanding
Read 1,188
Write 676
Mixed 1,065
SusWrite 332
182% 815 MB/s
4K Read 44.9
4K Write 131
4K Mixed 65.1
221% 80.2 MB/s
DQ Read 602
DQ Write 775
DQ Mixed 645
499% 674 MB/s
Poor: 68%
This bench: 167%
Great: 167%
JetFlash Transcend 32GB
25GB free, PID 1000
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 27 29 29 26 27 29 MB/s
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
11.9% Very poor
Read 16.7
Write 6.5
Mixed 24.9
SusWrite 27.8
27% 19 MB/s
4K Read 0.1
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 1.9
102% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 11.9%
Great: 58%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378A1G43EB1-CPB Hynix HMA41GU6AFR8N-TF M378A1G43EB1-CPB Hynix HMA41GU6AFR8N-TF 32GB
2133, 2133, 2133, 2133 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
73.7% Very good
MC Read 26.3
MC Write 28.5
MC Mixed 23.6
75% 26.1 GB/s
SC Read 16.9
SC Write 27.8
SC Mixed 22.6
64% 22.4 GB/s
Latency 71.9
56% 71.9 ns
Poor: 65%
This bench: 73.7%
Great: 76%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H170M-PLUS Builds (Compare 1,366 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus H170M-PLUS - $296

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 54% - Above average Total price: $671
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback