Gigabyte GA-P67X-UD3-B3

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 29%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 83%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 25%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (48th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 52 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 78.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics31% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive42.8% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
6 years ago, 6 years ago.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-P67X-UD3-B3  (all builds)
Memory14.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.9 GHz
DisplayЦвета: 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130313
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 19 '17 at 02:57
Run Duration126 Seconds
Run User RUS-User
Background CPU10%

 PC Performing as expected (48th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-2700K-$89
Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-2700K CPU @ 3.50GHz, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.9 GHz, turbo 4.35 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
78.5% Very good
Memory 95.9
1-Core 103
2-Core 191
77% 130 Pts
4-Core 330
8-Core 526
53% 428 Pts
64-Core 528
33% 528 Pts
Poor: 60%
This bench: 78.5%
Great: 85%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 680-$360
Asus(1043 842E) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1202 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 385.41
Performing below potential (54th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
31% Below average
Lighting 37
Reflection 37
Parallax 44.8
30% 39.6 fps
MRender 47.8
Gravity 40.6
Splatting 34.1
33% 40.9 fps
Poor: 29%
This bench: 31%
Great: 35%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Adata Premier Pro SP920 128GB-$35
77GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.14 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
42.8% Average
Read 310
Write 151
Mixed 142
44% 201 MB/s
4K Read 18.7
4K Write 46
4K Mixed 10.2
66% 25 MB/s
DQ Read 24.1
DQ Write 71.6
DQ Mixed 11.9
20% 35.9 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 42.8%
Great: 85%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$35
189GB free
Firmware: 15.01H15 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
59.5% Above average
Read 114
Write 93
Mixed 64.4
67% 90.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.47
4K Write 1.98
4K Mixed 0.2
79% 0.89 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 59.5%
Great: 109%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair XMS3 DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1867 MHz
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
64.9% Good
MC Read 22.4
MC Write 23.5
MC Mixed 20.6
63% 22.2 GB/s
SC Read 19.1
SC Write 19.2
SC Mixed 20.8
56% 19.7 GB/s
Latency 54.2
74% 54.2 ns
Poor: 42%
This bench: 64.9%
Great: 65%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-P67X-UD3-B3 Builds (Compare 159 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 37%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-P67X-UD3-B3

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 75% - Very good Total price: $403
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $166Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback