Today's hottest deals

Asus P8Z77-V LX

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 30%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 24%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (23rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 77 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics36.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
MotherboardAsus P8Z77-V LX  (all builds)
Memory12.2 GB free of 24 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140721
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateFeb 14 '22 at 02:41
Run Duration419 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU6%

 PC Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3570
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
74.5% Very good
Memory 84.2
1-Core 109
2-Core 211
77% 135 Pts
4-Core 376
8-Core 376
50% 376 Pts
64-Core 361
22% 361 Pts
Poor: 50%
This bench: 74.5%
Great: 75%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 6700-XT-$480
Asus(1043 05D7) ≥ 4GB
Ram: 12GB, Driver: 21.10.2
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
36.3% Below average
Lighting 44.3
Reflection 26.2
Parallax 32.2
36% 34.2 fps
MRender 0.2
Gravity 114
Splatting 24.6
37% 46.3 fps
Poor: 113%
This bench: 36.3%
Great: 129%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$80
363GB free
Firmware: RVT0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 98 76 64 78 70 72 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (0th percentile)
53.9% Above average
Read 324
Write 304
Mixed 272
SusWrite 76.2
55% 244 MB/s
4K Read 27.7
4K Write 41
4K Mixed 32.9
106% 33.9 MB/s
DQ Read 43
DQ Write 94.9
DQ Mixed 51.5
44% 63.1 MB/s
Poor: 74%
This bench: 53.9%
Great: 129%
Kingston SUV5001 120GB
32GB free
Firmware: 0030
SusWrite @10s intervals: 98 76 64 78 70 72 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
49.9% Average
Read 300
Write 266
Mixed 227
SusWrite 76.2
49% 217 MB/s
4K Read 27
4K Write 42.5
4K Mixed 27.7
99% 32.4 MB/s
DQ Read 37.4
DQ Write 81
DQ Mixed 43.2
38% 53.9 MB/s
Poor: 44%
This bench: 49.9%
Great: 87%
WD WD20EZAZ-00WGYX0 2TB
1TB free (System drive)
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 65 91 91 105 74 50 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
49% Average
Read 89.8
Write 80.9
Mixed 57.1
SusWrite 79.3
56% 76.8 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 5.4
4K Mixed 0.7
219% 2.37 MB/s
Poor: 25%
This bench: 49%
Great: 102%
WD Blue 4TB (2015)-$85
290GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 89 91 90 89 91 91 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
53.7% Above average
Read 96.2
Write 104
Mixed 63.6
SusWrite 90.3
65% 88.5 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 1
199% 1.5 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 53.7%
Great: 101%
WD Blue 4TB (2015)-$85
1.5TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 125 137 134 136 126 138 MB/s
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
74.3% Very good
Read 127
Write 100
Mixed 28.7
SusWrite 133
70% 97.1 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0.5
106% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 74.3%
Great: 101%
Seagate Desktop HDD 4TB (2013)-$61
516GB free
Firmware: CC54
SusWrite @10s intervals: 81 87 88 89 89 89 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
62.6% Good
Read 131
Write 82.5
Mixed 66.3
SusWrite 87.1
68% 91.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.6
121% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 62.6%
Great: 96%
WD Blue 4TB (2015)-$85
534GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 109 110 110 109 108 111 MB/s
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
76.4% Very good
Read 156
Write 149
Mixed 88.3
SusWrite 110
92% 126 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 1
201% 1.53 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 76.4%
Great: 101%
Seagate Barracuda 4TB (2017)-$70
1TB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 98 76 63 78 71 72 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
52.9% Above average
Read 108
Write 109
Mixed 68
SusWrite 76.2
67% 90.4 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 0.8
4K Mixed 0.3
94% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 52.9%
Great: 90%
Seagate FA GoFlex Desk 1.5TB
751GB free, PID 5071
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.8 4.7 4.8 4.8 4.7 4.8 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
4.24% Terrible
Read 12.7
Write 6.5
Mixed 7.2
SusWrite 4.7
10% 7.78 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 0.4
4K Mixed 0.4
29% 0.47 MB/s
Poor: 8%
This bench: 4.24%
Great: 18%
Hitachi HDT721010SLA360 1TB
331GB free, PID 2339
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.8 4.8 4.8 4.8 4.8 4.9 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
8.6% Terrible
Read 13
Write 6.7
Mixed 8.7
SusWrite 4.8
10% 8.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.7
87% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 8.6%
Great: 20%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 99U5471-028.A00LF 859B BLS8G3D1609DS1S00. 99U5471-028.A00LF 859B BLS8G3D1609DS1S00. 24GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 8192, 4096, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
50.3% Above average
MC Read 17.4
MC Write 18.5
MC Mixed 15.3
49% 17.1 GB/s
SC Read 14.4
SC Write 18.1
SC Mixed 16.5
47% 16.3 GB/s
Latency 73.2
55% 73.2 ns
Poor: 49%
This bench: 50.3%
Great: 52%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P8Z77-V LX Builds (Compare 5,788 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 37%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 29%
Raft

Motherboard: Asus P8Z77-V LX

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 65% - Good Total price: $318
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $240Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $365
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback