Today's hottest deals

Asrock H81M-VG4 R2.0

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (67th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 33 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Boot Drive86.6% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 15 years and 3 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
MotherboardAsrock H81M-VG4 R2.0  (all builds)
Memory4.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20140704
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 01 '20 at 00:08
Run Duration126 Seconds
Run User KAZ-User
Background CPU6%

 PC Performing above expectations (67th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4670-$118
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
77.2% Very good
Memory 91.2
1-Core 109
2-Core 205
78% 135 Pts
4-Core 364
8-Core 379
49% 372 Pts
64-Core 414
26% 414 Pts
Poor: 47%
This bench: 77.2%
Great: 77%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SUV5001 120GB
42GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 56RA
SusWrite @10s intervals: 133 69 53 67 44 71 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
86.6% Excellent
Read 468
Write 302
Mixed 262
SusWrite 72.8
61% 276 MB/s
4K Read 42
4K Write 90.6
4K Mixed 49.3
175% 60.6 MB/s
DQ Read 257
DQ Write 161
DQ Mixed 97
102% 171 MB/s
Poor: 44%
This bench: 86.6%
Great: 87%
Seagate Barracuda Green 1TB-$75
442GB free
Firmware: CC3C
SusWrite @10s intervals: 93 76 83 71 83 98 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
44.9% Average
Read 71
Write 111
Mixed 28.3
SusWrite 83.9
53% 73.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 6
4K Mixed 0.5
196% 2.4 MB/s
Poor: 32%
This bench: 44.9%
Great: 75%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing above expectations (60th percentile)
33.3% Below average
MC Read 11.2
MC Write 11.2
MC Mixed 9.5
30% 10.6 GB/s
SC Read 9.5
SC Write 10.6
SC Mixed 10
29% 10 GB/s
Latency 65.4
61% 65.4 ns
Poor: 18%
This bench: 33.3%
Great: 67%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H81M-VG4 R2.0 Builds (Compare 1,365 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 58%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asrock H81M-VG4 R2.0

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 63% - Good Total price: $219
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $129
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $389
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback