Today's hottest deals

Toshiba SATELLITE C55D-A-14M

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 13%
Tree trunk
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (23rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 77 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 9.61%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Graphics1.01% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive41.2% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.
Very high background CPU (92%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemToshiba SATELLITE C55D-A-14M  (all builds)
MotherboardAMD PT10AN
Memory1.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit renk
OSWindows 8.1
BIOS Date20140521
Uptime2.1 Days
Run DateFeb 05 '22 at 19:36
Run Duration140 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU 92%

 PC Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD E1-2100 APU
Socket FT1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 1 GHz, turbo 1 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
9.61% Terrible
Memory 17.7
1-Core 6.7
2-Core 10.2
9% 11.5 Pts
4-Core 9.8
8-Core 8.9
1% 9.35 Pts
64-Core 24.2
2% 24.2 Pts
Poor: 6%
This bench: 9.61%
Great: 26%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD HD 8210
Toshiba(1179 FA33) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 16.12.2
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
1.01% Terrible
Lighting 1
Reflection 2.4
Parallax 1.4
1% 1.6 fps
MRender 2
Gravity 0.9
Splatting 2.1
1% 1.67 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.01%
Great: 1%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SSD 128GB 128GB
98GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2111XKR
SusWrite @10s intervals: 169 146 219 206 195 36 MB/s
Performing below potential (9th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
41.2% Average
Read 253
Write 246
Mixed 182
SusWrite 162
47% 211 MB/s
4K Read 14.5
4K Write 27
4K Mixed 17.7
59% 19.7 MB/s
DQ Read 60.2
DQ Write 64.2
DQ Mixed 80.4
56% 68.3 MB/s
Poor: 37%
This bench: 41.2%
Great: 93%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 99U5469-046.A00LF Samsung M471B5273CM0-CH9 8GB
1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
7.51% Terrible
MC Read 2.4
MC Write 2.2
MC Mixed 2.8
7% 2.47 GB/s
SC Read 2.6
SC Write 2
SC Mixed 2.1
6% 2.23 GB/s
Latency 338
12% 338 ns
Poor: 8%
This bench: 7.51%
Great: 47%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical SATELLITE C55D-A-14M Builds (Compare 2 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 20%
Surfboard
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

System: Toshiba SATELLITE C55D-A-14M

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $400
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback