Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (35th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 65 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 26.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Boot Drive	53% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Hitachi FLORA Se210 RK4 (all builds)
Motherboard	HITACHI HTC2141
Memory	0.4 GB free of 2 GB @ 0.8 GHz
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20131225
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Aug 04 '21 at 20:30
Run Duration	159 Seconds
Run User	ZAF-User
Background CPU	12%

PC Performing below expectations (35^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD E1-2100 APU 4,569 User benchmarks, average bench 17% P0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 1 GHz Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	26.4% Poor	Memory 48.5 1-Core 14.7 2-Core 21.6 22% 28.3 Pts	4-Core 27.8 8-Core 27.1 4% 27.5 Pts	64-Core 30 2% 30 Pts
Poor: 6% ↑ This bench: 26.4% Great: 26%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Liteonit LMT-128M6M mSATA 128GB 1,674 User benchmarks, average bench 72% 101GB free (System drive) Firmware: DM7110F SusWrite @10s intervals: 255 275 283 253 273 286 MB/s Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)	53% Above average	Read 382 Write 276 Mixed 223 SusWrite 271 64% 288 MB/s	4K Read 16.9 4K Write 22.4 4K Mixed 17.1 59% 18.8 MB/s	DQ Read 69.1 DQ Write 56.8 DQ Mixed 62.8 47% 62.9 MB/s
Poor: 56% ↑ This bench: 53% Great: 86%
SanDisk Cruzer Blade 16GB 60,539 User benchmarks, average bench 11% 7GB free, PID 5567 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 6 3.8 3.3 5.7 3.8 4.3 MB/s Performing way below expectations (20^th percentile)	6.63% Terrible	Read 26.6 Write 5 Mixed 9.2 SusWrite 4.5 12% 11.3 MB/s	4K Read 2.4 4K Write 0.4 4K Mixed 0.8 50% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 5% ↑ This bench: 6.63% Great: 17%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Hynix HMT425S6AFR6A-PB 1x2GB 3,854 User benchmarks, average bench 18% 1 of 1 slots used 2GB SODIMM DDR3 800 MHz clocked @ 667 MHz Performing below potential (19^th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	11.3% Very poor	MC Read 4.4 MC Write 2.8 MC Mixed 4.6 11% 3.93 GB/s	SC Read 0.4 SC Write 3.2 SC Mixed 0.7 4% 1.43 GB/s	Latency 166 24% 166 ns
Poor: 8% ↑ This bench: 11.3% Great: 31%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16