Performance Results


Gaming 3% Tree trunk	Desktop 57% Gunboat	Workstation 3% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (64th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 36 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 54.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	1.95% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	52.9% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Windows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.

PC Performing above expectations (64^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-2450M-$225 51,836 User benchmarks, average bench 49% CPU Socket - U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 2.65 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (77^th percentile)	54.8% Above average	Memory 84.9 1-Core 80.2 2-Core 151 64% 105 Pts	4-Core 150 8-Core 130 19% 140 Pts	64-Core 129 8% 129 Pts
Poor: 25% ↑ This bench: 54.8% Great: 59%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD 3000 (Mobile V2 1.3 GHz) 110,588 User benchmarks, average bench 2% Sanyo(144D C652) 1.8GB Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 9.17.10.4459 Performing as expected (55^th percentile)	1.95% Terrible	Lighting 2.2 Reflection 2.4 Parallax 1.7 2% 2.1 fps	MRender 2.8 Gravity 2.7 Splatting 2.8 2% 2.77 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1.95% Great: 2%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston A400 240GB-$28 424,288 User benchmarks, average bench 66% 190GB free (System drive) Firmware: S3501103 SusWrite @10s intervals: 194 223 237 224 218 217 MB/s Performing below potential (30^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	52.9% Above average	Read 242 Write 212 Mixed 220 SusWrite 219 50% 223 MB/s	4K Read 17.2 4K Write 43.2 4K Mixed 21.1 76% 27.2 MB/s	DQ Read 122 DQ Write 165 DQ Mixed 95 85% 127 MB/s
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 52.9% Great: 100%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown SH564568FH8NZPHSCR 0194 SH564568FH8NWPHSFG 4GB 21 User benchmarks, average bench 37% 1333, 1333 MHz 2048, 2048 MB Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	49.8% Average	MC Read 17.2 MC Write 17.8 MC Mixed 16.7 49% 17.2 GB/s	SC Read 13.2 SC Write 14.9 SC Mixed 14.5 41% 14.2 GB/s	Latency 72 56% 72 ns
Poor: 22% ↑ This bench: 49.8% Great: 50%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 48%

Yacht

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

GPU
HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz)IntelBench 3%, 409,110 samples	503x
HD 3000 (Mobile V1 1.1/1.2 GHz)IntelBench 2%, 209,058 samples	247x
HD Graphics (G2 Pentium/Celeron 1.1/1.15 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 45,735 samples	200x

RAM
AM1U16BC4P2-B19C 1x4GBAdataBench 30%, 1,080 samples	71x
AD73I1C1674EV 1x4GBAdataBench 25%, 5,119 samples	24x
M471B5273EB0-CK0 1x4GBSamsungBench 28%, 3,287 samples	23x

Value: 57% - Above average

Total price: $80

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $64	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16