Asrock X399 Taichi

Performance Results


Gaming 131% UFO	Desktop 88% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 161% UFO


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 80.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	167% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	313% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Motherboard	Asrock X399 Taichi (all builds)
Memory	57.3 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20181224
Uptime	0.2 Days
Run Date	Jan 28 '22 at 17:02
Run Duration	266 Seconds
Run User	SVK-User
Background CPU	1%

PC Performing as expected (53^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen TR 1950X-$225 23,641 User benchmarks, average bench 77% SP3r2, 1 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (82^nd percentile)	80.7% Excellent	Memory 75.4 1-Core 124 2-Core 236 80% 145 Pts	4-Core 461 8-Core 919 81% 690 Pts	64-Core 2,320 144% 2,320 Pts
Poor: 68% ↑ This bench: 80.7% Great: 85%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX A5000 809 User benchmarks, average bench 166% HP(103C 147E) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 4000 MHz, Ram: 24GB, Driver: 511.09 Performing below potential (55^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	167% Outstanding	Lighting 228 Reflection 226 Parallax 241 186% 232 fps	MRender 306 Gravity 183 Splatting 181 177% 223 fps
Poor: 154% ↑ This bench: 167% Great: 172%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 2TB-$150 200,600 User benchmarks, average bench 336% 590GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 1656 1220 1387 1378 1385 1362 MB/s Performing below expectations (34^th percentile)	313% Outstanding	Read 2,584 Write 2,404 Mixed 1,846 SusWrite 1398 461% 2,058 MB/s	4K Read 62.6 4K Write 147 4K Mixed 84.8 281% 98.2 MB/s	DQ Read 924 DQ Write 706 DQ Mixed 781 593% 803 MB/s
Poor: 223% ↑ This bench: 313% Great: 435%
WD WD10JUCT-63J6SY0 1TB 3,317 User benchmarks, average bench 47% 322GB free Firmware: 01.01A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 72 73 74 74 75 73 MB/s Performing below expectations (29^th percentile)	40.8% Average	Read 68.5 Write 69.7 Mixed 40.5 SusWrite 73.4 46% 63 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.8 4K Mixed 0.6 121% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 25% ↑ This bench: 40.8% Great: 62%
WD WD10JUCT-63J6SY0 1TB 3,317 User benchmarks, average bench 47% 49GB free Firmware: 01.01A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 54 54 55 55 55 55 MB/s Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile)	31.2% Below average	Read 53.7 Write 57 Mixed 32.2 SusWrite 54.8 36% 49.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.3 4K Mixed 0.6 112% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 25% ↑ This bench: 31.2% Great: 62%
WD WD10JUCT-63J6SY0 1TB 3,317 User benchmarks, average bench 47% 367GB free Firmware: 01.01A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 79 78 81 80 81 80 MB/s Performing below expectations (31^st percentile)	41.6% Average	Read 65 Write 69 Mixed 41 SusWrite 79.7 47% 63.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.8 4K Mixed 0.8 143% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 25% ↑ This bench: 41.6% Great: 62%
WD WD10JUCT-63J6SY0 1TB 3,317 User benchmarks, average bench 47% 925GB free Firmware: 01.01A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 99 100 99 101 101 102 MB/s Performing above expectations (82^nd percentile)	57.5% Above average	Read 100 Write 98 Mixed 48.7 SusWrite 100 63% 86.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 2.1 4K Mixed 0.8 149% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 25% ↑ This bench: 57.5% Great: 62%
Seagate IronWolf 4TB (2016)-$95 26,217 User benchmarks, average bench 90% 2.5TB free Firmware: SC60 SusWrite @10s intervals: 171 177 182 182 182 182 MB/s Performing above expectations (84^th percentile)	104% Outstanding	Read 185 Write 173 Mixed 79.2 SusWrite 179 112% 154 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 2.1 4K Mixed 0.8 161% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 62% ↑ This bench: 104% Great: 108%
Seagate IronWolf 4TB (2016)-$95 26,217 User benchmarks, average bench 90% 3.5TB free Firmware: SC60 SusWrite @10s intervals: 168 161 170 175 176 183 MB/s Performing above expectations (67^th percentile)	99.2% Outstanding	Read 174 Write 173 Mixed 79.2 SusWrite 172 109% 149 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.8 4K Mixed 0.8 147% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 62% ↑ This bench: 99.2% Great: 108%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Adata DDR4 3000 2OZ Kingston KF3200C16D4/16GX DDR4 3000 2OZ DDR4 3000 2OZ Kingston KF3200C16D4/16GX DDR4 3000 2OZ 64GB 4 User benchmarks, average bench 59% 2400, 2400, 2400, 2400, 2400, 2400 MHz 8192, 16384, 8192, 8192, 16384, 8192 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	47.4% Average	MC Read 17.3 MC Write 14.3 MC Mixed 15.3 45% 15.6 GB/s	SC Read 18.3 SC Write 18.4 SC Mixed 18.9 53% 18.5 GB/s	Latency 89.5 45% 89.5 ns
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 47.4% Great: 80%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical X399 Taichi Builds (Compare 561 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 99%

Nuclear submarine

Desktop 86%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 120%

UFO

Motherboard: Asrock X399 Taichi

CPU
Ryzen TR 1950XAMD $225Bench 77%, 23,641 samples	155x
Ryzen TR 1920XAMD $800Bench 78%, 10,440 samples	114x
Ryzen TR 2950XAMD $1,075Bench 81%, 10,169 samples	103x

GPU
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	47x
RTX 3090Nvidia $1,148Bench 210%, 158,856 samples	36x
RTX 2080-TiNvidia $441Bench 156%, 357,946 samples	27x

SSD
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $95Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	38x
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $158Bench 297%, 331,647 samples	28x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 276%, 367,854 samples	19x

RAM
Trident Z DDR4 3200 C16 4x8GBG.SKILL $113Bench 91%, 87,239 samples	13x
Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 2x16GBG.SKILLBench 89%, 92,468 samples	12x
Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 4x16GBG.SKILL $139Bench 95%, 14,506 samples	11x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 80% - Excellent

Total price: $918

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16