Today's hottest deals

Lenovo 81V5

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 38%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (37th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 63 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 40%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics2.14% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive109% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemLenovo 81V5  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO LNVNB161216
Memory3.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colori
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191028
Uptime2.6 Days
Run DateJan 24 '22 at 14:08
Run Duration151 Seconds
Run User ITA-User
Background CPU 12%

 PC Performing below expectations (37th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 3500U
FP5, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.1 GHz, turbo 2.3 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
40% Average
Memory 31.6
1-Core 67.2
2-Core 133
41% 77.3 Pts
4-Core 261
8-Core 370
40% 315 Pts
64-Core 418
26% 418 Pts
Poor: 30%
This bench: 40%
Great: 63%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon Vega 8 Graphics
Legend(17AA 3808) 2GB
Ram: 2GB, Driver: 19.40.46
Relative performance (0th percentile)
2.14% Terrible
Lighting 2.6
Reflection 2.8
Parallax 3.7
2% 3.03 fps
MRender 3
Gravity 2.8
Splatting 2.3
2% 2.7 fps
Poor: 6%
This bench: 2.14%
Great: 13%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
HFM256GDHTNG-8310A 256GB
181GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 80060C00
SusWrite @10s intervals: 438 357 357 359 361 363 MB/s
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
109% Outstanding
Read 807
Write 632
Mixed 426
SusWrite 372
125% 560 MB/s
4K Read 29.1
4K Write 53.7
4K Mixed 30.3
111% 37.7 MB/s
DQ Read 497
DQ Write 375
DQ Mixed 409
313% 427 MB/s
Poor: 70%
This bench: 109%
Great: 148%
Kingston DataTraveler 100 G3 USB 3.0 64GB-$14
54GB free, PID 1666
Operating at USB 3.2 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 14 20 20 20 6.1 MB/s
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
19.6% Very poor
Read 89
Write 25.7
Mixed 32.5
SusWrite 16
44% 40.8 MB/s
4K Read 8.4
4K Write 0.4
4K Mixed 1.1
82% 3.3 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 19.6%
Great: 30%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Ramaxel RMSA3270ME86H9F-2666 Micron 4ATF51264HZ-2G6E! 8GB
2400, 2400 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
26.4% Poor
MC Read 7.6
MC Write 7.4
MC Mixed 12.6
26% 9.2 GB/s
SC Read 8.3
SC Write 7.3
SC Mixed 12.4
27% 9.33 GB/s
Latency 245
16% 245 ns
Poor: 26%
This bench: 26.4%
Great: 76%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 81V5 Builds (Compare 121 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 55%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 81V5

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $291WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $226Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback