HP 255 G7 Notebook PC

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 32%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (31st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 69 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 32%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics2.13% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive68.7% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Very high background CPU (31%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP 255 G7 Notebook PC  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 85EA
Memory1.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20200508
Uptime0.8 Days
Run DateJan 21 '22 at 10:21
Run Duration154 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 31%

 PC Performing below expectations (31st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 3500U
FP5, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.1 GHz, turbo 2.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
32% Below average
Memory 22.7
1-Core 68.7
2-Core 117
36% 69.5 Pts
4-Core 220
8-Core 374
36% 297 Pts
64-Core 462
29% 462 Pts
Poor: 30%
This bench: 32%
Great: 63%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon Vega 8 Graphics
HP(103C 85EA) 2GB
Ram: 2GB, Driver: 19.40.48
Relative performance (0th percentile)
2.13% Terrible
Lighting 2.6
Reflection 2.8
Parallax 3.6
2% 3 fps
MRender 2.9
Gravity 2.8
Splatting 2.3
2% 2.67 fps
Poor: 6%
This bench: 2.13%
Great: 13%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
IM2P33F8-512GD 512GB
324GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HP02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 192 283 212 215 323 234 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
68.7% Good
Read 334
Write 276
Mixed 283
SusWrite 243
64% 284 MB/s
4K Read 30.4
4K Write 52.3
4K Mixed 19.5
99% 34.1 MB/s
DQ Read 383
DQ Write 125
DQ Mixed 75.5
102% 194 MB/s
Poor: 69%
This bench: 68.7%
Great: 227%
SABRENT 500GB
465GB free
Firmware: 0204
SusWrite @10s intervals: 90 94 94 85 89 95 MB/s
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
55.7% Above average
Read 103
Write 65.1
Mixed 40.4
SusWrite 91.3
55% 75 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 0.4
78% 0.57 MB/s
Poor: 19%
This bench: 55.7%
Great: 63%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A1K43CB1-CTD 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
36.4% Below average
MC Read 15.1
MC Write 13.9
MC Mixed 12.9
40% 14 GB/s
SC Read 7.5
SC Write 8.2
SC Mixed 9.3
24% 8.33 GB/s
Latency 301
13% 301 ns
Poor: 29%
This bench: 36.4%
Great: 46%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 255 G7 Notebook PC Builds (Compare 649 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 52%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

System: HP 255 G7 Notebook PC

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback