Fujitsu CELSIUS M720

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 83%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 22%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics21.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive95.2% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemFujitsu CELSIUS M720  (all builds)
MotherboardFUJITSU D3128-A1
Memory11.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130920
Uptime1.7 Days
Run DateJan 21 '22 at 08:22
Run Duration147 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing as expected (55th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5-1620 0-$345
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
77.7% Very good
Memory 92.2
1-Core 95.4
2-Core 191
74% 126 Pts
4-Core 343
8-Core 490
52% 416 Pts
64-Core 484
30% 484 Pts
Poor: 61%
This bench: 77.7%
Great: 77%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro K4200-$820
Nvidia(10DE 1096) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 888 MHz, MLim: 1350 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 472.84
Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)
21.6% Poor
Lighting 23.8
Reflection 29.5
Parallax 35.7
19% 29.7 fps
MRender 39
Gravity 29.8
Splatting 27.8
26% 32.2 fps
Poor: 20%
This bench: 21.6%
Great: 22%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZ7KM960HAHP-00005 960GB
849GB free (System drive)
Firmware: GXM1003Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 322 418 420 430 416 417 MB/s
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
95.2% Outstanding
Read 453
Write 430
Mixed 390
SusWrite 404
94% 419 MB/s
4K Read 22.9
4K Write 72.4
4K Mixed 34.2
117% 43.2 MB/s
DQ Read 388
DQ Write 340
DQ Mixed 361
272% 363 MB/s
Poor: 76%
This bench: 95.2%
Great: 125%
LSI Logical Volume 16TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: 3000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 198 235 242 242 242 243 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
35.1% Below average
Read 335
Write 321
Mixed 97.6
SusWrite 234
55% 247 MB/s
4K Read 8.8
4K Write 12.1
4K Mixed 2.8
23% 7.9 MB/s
DQ Read 8.9
DQ Write 27.3
DQ Mixed 7
9% 14.4 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 35.1%
Great: 52%
LSI Logical Volume 4TB
3TB free
Firmware: 3000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 36 41 42 41 42 42 MB/s
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
51.9% Above average
Read 140
Write 41.1
Mixed 52.3
SusWrite 40.7
50% 68.5 MB/s
4K Read 1.7
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0.7
160% 1 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 51.9%
Great: 115%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M391B5773DH0- 8x2GB
8 of 8 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
92% Outstanding
MC Read 34.1
MC Write 39.3
MC Mixed 34
102% 35.8 GB/s
SC Read 15.7
SC Write 13.4
SC Mixed 13
40% 14 GB/s
Latency 63.8
63% 63.8 ns
Poor: 33%
This bench: 92%
Great: 109%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical CELSIUS M720 Builds (Compare 111 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk

System: Fujitsu CELSIUS M720

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 62% - Good Total price: $373
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $154Nvidia RTX 4060 $250WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback