Dell Precision Tower 7910

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 42%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 42%
Speed boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics46.5% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive108% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory48GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 48GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemDell Precision Tower 7910
MotherboardDell Precision Tower 7910  (all builds)
Memory41.8 GB free of 48 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190327
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 17 '19 at 19:12
Run Duration138 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU1%
Watch Gameplay: 580 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (50th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel
SOCKET 1, 2 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.35 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
73.6% Very good
Memory 74.1
1-Core 102
2-Core 199
70% 125 Pts
4-Core 392
8-Core 721
67% 556 Pts
64-Core 1,057
65% 1,057 Pts
Poor: 64%
This bench: 73.6%
Great: 83%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 580-$130
MSI(1462 8A92) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1340 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 19.5.1
Performing below potential (13th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
46.5% Average
Lighting 53.8
Reflection 69.4
Parallax 83.2
44% 68.8 fps
MRender 69.7
Gravity 67.1
Splatting 55.7
52% 64.2 fps
Poor: 46%
This bench: 46.5%
Great: 56%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$137
667GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 400 465 467 471 470 471 MB/s
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
108% Outstanding
Read 497
Write 471
Mixed 451
SusWrite 457
106% 469 MB/s
4K Read 35.2
4K Write 61.1
4K Mixed 44.2
142% 46.8 MB/s
DQ Read 375
DQ Write 312
DQ Mixed 337
254% 341 MB/s
Poor: 81%
This bench: 108%
Great: 133%
LSI Logical Volume 4TB
3.5TB free
Firmware: 3000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 176 189 203 178 191 203 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
115% Outstanding
Read 210
Write 192
Mixed 91.5
SusWrite 190
125% 171 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 1.1
188% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 115%
Great: 115%
LSI Logical Volume 8TB
7.5TB free
Firmware: 3000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 388 378 409 383 389 403 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 21% Great: 133%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378A1K43BB1-CPB 6x8GB
6 of 16 slots used
48GB DIMM DDR4 2133 MHz clocked @ 1866 MHz
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
99.1% Outstanding
MC Read 46.1
MC Write 35
MC Mixed 36.8
112% 39.3 GB/s
SC Read 10.7
SC Write 18.7
SC Mixed 16.8
44% 15.4 GB/s
Latency 92.3
43% 92.3 ns
Poor: 94%
This bench: 99.1%
Great: 99%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Precision Tower 7910 Builds (Compare 1,183 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 31%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 41%
Speed boat

Motherboard: Dell Precision Tower 7910

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback