Upcloud Cloud Server

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 35.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Memory2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemUpcloud Cloud Server  (all builds)
Motherboard
Memory0.1 GB free of 2 GB @ 0 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors, 1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140401
Uptime7.5 Days
Run DateJan 19 '22 at 08:28
Run Duration161 Seconds
Run User FIN-User
Background CPU8%

 PC Performing below expectations (40th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD EPYC 7542 32-Core
CPU 0, 1 CPU, 1 cores, 1 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 2.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
35.7% Below average
Memory 53.2
1-Core 108
2-Core 106
54% 89 Pts
4-Core 107
8-Core 108
14% 107 Pts
64-Core 107
7% 107 Pts
Poor: 36%
This bench: 35.7%
Great: 73%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Red Hat VirtIO 54GB
36GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 174 391 400 361 177 311 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 14% Great: 106%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
QEMU 1x2GB
1 of 1 slots used
2GB DIMM RAM
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
53.1% Above average
MC Read 15.6
MC Write 16
MC Mixed 24.5
53% 18.7 GB/s
SC Read 14.6
SC Write 16.2
SC Mixed 25.7
54% 18.8 GB/s
Latency 149
27% 149 ns
Poor: 13%
This bench: 53.1%
Great: 89%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $171Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $270Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback