QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996)

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (98th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 2 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics81.9% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory122GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 122GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (25%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemQEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996)  (all builds)
Motherboard
Memory115.6 GB free of 122.07 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1024 x 768 - 32 Bit kleuren, 2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit kleuren
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150206
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 19 '20 at 14:41
Run Duration118 Seconds
Run User NLD-User
Background CPU 25%
Watch Gameplay: 2080-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD EPYC 7542 32-Core
CPU 0, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 2.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
72.8% Very good
Memory 59.8
1-Core 118
2-Core 236
74% 138 Pts
4-Core 459
8-Core 886
80% 672 Pts
64-Core 1,740
108% 1,740 Pts
Poor: 36%
This bench: 72.8%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2080-Ti-$365
Gigabyte(1458 37C4) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 452.06
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
81.9% Excellent
Lighting 95.4
Reflection 129
Parallax 118
78% 114 fps
MRender 140
Gravity 117
Splatting 84.3
90% 114 fps
Poor: 128%
This bench: 81.9%
Great: 174%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Red Hat VirtIO 215GB
97GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 636 671 774 857 875 1023 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 11% Great: 93%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
QEMU 122GB
0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 MHz
16384, 16384, 16384, 16384, 16384, 16384, 16384, 10312 MB
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
200% Outstanding
MC Read 85.2
MC Write 62.6
MC Mixed 102
238% 83.2 GB/s
SC Read 16.8
SC Write 20.5
SC Mixed 28.9
63% 22.1 GB/s
Latency 128
31% 128 ns
Poor: 79%
This bench: 200%
Great: 200%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996) Builds (Compare 97 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 124%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 103%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 127%
UFO

System: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 84% - Excellent Total price: $350
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $171Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $270Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback