Dell XPS 8920

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 27%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 83%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 24%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (64th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 36 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics25.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive173% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemDell XPS 8920  (all builds)
MotherboardDell 0VHXCD
Memory26.5 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200611
Uptime2.9 Days
Run DateJan 18 '22 at 05:42
Run Duration282 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing above expectations (64th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7700-$167
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
75% Very good
Memory 81.8
1-Core 110
2-Core 197
74% 130 Pts
4-Core 368
8-Core 582
58% 475 Pts
64-Core 591
37% 591 Pts
Poor: 63%
This bench: 75%
Great: 84%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-$101
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 497.29
Performing below potential (73rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
25.6% Poor
Lighting 32
Reflection 34
Parallax 32.4
26% 32.8 fps
MRender 37.9
Gravity 33.3
Splatting 23
25% 31.4 fps
Poor: 24%
This bench: 25.6%
Great: 28%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WDC PC SN530 SDBPMPZ-256G-1101 256GB
163GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 21110001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 286 220 221 220 240 222 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
173% Outstanding
Read 1,451
Write 913
Mixed 945
SusWrite 235
196% 886 MB/s
4K Read 47.6
4K Write 138
4K Mixed 68.2
233% 84.8 MB/s
DQ Read 683
DQ Write 608
DQ Mixed 576
451% 623 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 173%
Great: 179%
Seagate ST2000LM015-2E8174 2TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 109 115 114 110 119 118 MB/s
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
52.5% Above average
Read 69
Write 87
Mixed 64.2
SusWrite 114
62% 83.5 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.7
152% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 52.5%
Great: 70%
Hitachi HUA723020ALA641 2TB-$78
2TB free
Firmware: MK7OA840
SusWrite @10s intervals: 142 142 141 142 140 144 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
79.3% Very good
Read 134
Write 147
Mixed 74.6
SusWrite 142
91% 125 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.9
176% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 79.3%
Great: 82%
SABRENT DISK00 750GB
699GB free, PID 1561
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 93 113 112 114 114 112 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
47.6% Average
Read 116
Write 116
Mixed 64.4
SusWrite 110
136% 102 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.8
104% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 8%
This bench: 47.6%
Great: 48%
SABRENT DISK01 320GB
298GB free, PID 1561
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 52 58 56 56 55 55 MB/s
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
28% Poor
Read 89.9
Write 90.9
Mixed 53.5
SusWrite 55.4
95% 72.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 0.6
53% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 28%
Great: 32%
SABRENT DISK02 160GB
149GB free, PID 1561
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 53 58 56 56 55 55 MB/s
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
25% Poor
Read 58.3
Write 58.6
Mixed 40.6
SusWrite 55.5
72% 53.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.7
73% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 19%
This bench: 25%
Great: 126%
SABRENT DISK03 320GB
298GB free, PID 1561
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 38 58 57 56 55 57 MB/s
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
25.8% Poor
Read 69.1
Write 66.2
Mixed 38.2
SusWrite 53.5
75% 56.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.7
70% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 25.8%
Great: 32%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 8ATF1G64AZ-2G3H1 85F7 W641GU42J7240NB 8ATF1G64AZ-2G3H1 85F7 W641GU42J7240NB 32GB
2400, 2400, 2400, 2400 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Performing above expectations (60th percentile)
79.7% Very good
MC Read 28.5
MC Write 31.3
MC Mixed 25.3
81% 28.4 GB/s
SC Read 16.7
SC Write 33.6
SC Mixed 24.7
71% 25 GB/s
Latency 77.3
52% 77.3 ns
Poor: 77%
This bench: 79.7%
Great: 81%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical XPS 8920 Builds (Compare 1,566 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 48%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 83%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 41%
Speed boat

System: Dell XPS 8920

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 99% - Outstanding Total price: $284
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $166Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback