Today's hottest deals

Asus MAXIMUS VI HERO

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 53%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 43%
Speed boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 84.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics62% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive99.5% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
MotherboardAsus MAXIMUS VI HERO  (all builds)
Memory7.9 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140815
Uptime1.9 Days
Run DateJan 17 '22 at 17:29
Run Duration251 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU1%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (50th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4770K-$75
SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
84.6% Excellent
Memory 94.3
1-Core 90.8
2-Core 208
76% 131 Pts
4-Core 404
8-Core 584
62% 494 Pts
64-Core 594
37% 594 Pts
Poor: 60%
This bench: 84.6%
Great: 84%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117
CLim: 2012 MHz, MLim: 2102 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 497.29
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
62% Good
Lighting 77.6
Reflection 79.3
Parallax 73.9
63% 76.9 fps
MRender 70.9
Gravity 76.5
Splatting 71.7
60% 73 fps
Poor: 51%
This bench: 62%
Great: 60%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Evo 250GB-$99
74GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXT0CB6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 182 97 99 93 103 97 MB/s
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
99.5% Outstanding
Read 503
Write 481
Mixed 348
SusWrite 112
80% 361 MB/s
4K Read 42
4K Write 94.3
4K Mixed 52.9
181% 63.1 MB/s
DQ Read 379
DQ Write 347
DQ Mixed 224
206% 317 MB/s
Poor: 64%
This bench: 99.5%
Great: 118%
SSD 240GB
88GB free
Firmware: SBFM61.5
SusWrite @10s intervals: 227 162 87 87 87 87 MB/s
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
86.8% Excellent
Read 474
Write 405
Mixed 389
SusWrite 123
78% 348 MB/s
4K Read 37.6
4K Write 87.5
4K Mixed 37.9
152% 54.3 MB/s
DQ Read 308
DQ Write 331
DQ Mixed 208
187% 282 MB/s
Poor: 45%
This bench: 86.8%
Great: 95%
Crucial P2 3D NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$39
49GB free
Firmware: P2CR010 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 210 334 225 247 289 287 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
111% Outstanding
Read 360
Write 364
Mixed 361
SusWrite 266
76% 338 MB/s
4K Read 46.3
4K Write 108
4K Mixed 61.3
206% 71.8 MB/s
DQ Read 384
DQ Write 365
DQ Mixed 547
363% 432 MB/s
Poor: 88%
This bench: 111%
Great: 228%
Seagate Desktop SSHD 4TB-$175
932GB free
Firmware: CC45
SusWrite @10s intervals: 18 35 33 32 32 33 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 44% Great: 94%
Seagate Barracuda Green 2TB
559GB free
Firmware: CC97
SusWrite @10s intervals: 39 41 41 40 39 36 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
14.3% Very poor
Read 10.3
Write 93.7
Mixed 9.4
SusWrite 39.5
28% 38.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.1
4K Write 0.8
4K Mixed 0.1
30% 0.33 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 14.3%
Great: 74%
Seagate Archive HDD 8TB (2015)-$137
4.5TB free
Firmware: RT18
SusWrite @10s intervals: 125 129 131 133 132 130 MB/s
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
53.6% Above average
Read 54.4
Write 85.1
Mixed 26.1
SusWrite 130
54% 73.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 7.4
4K Mixed 0.6
241% 2.97 MB/s
Poor: 21%
This bench: 53.6%
Great: 87%
Microsoft Virtual Disk 249GB
232GB free
Firmware: 1.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 40 40 41 40 39 35 MB/s
Performing below expectations (20th percentile)
12.9% Very poor
Read 5.5
Write 117
Mixed 8.8
SusWrite 39.3
31% 42.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.1
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.1
36% 0.43 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 12.9%
Great: 37%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown F3-12800CL9-4GBXL 0821 16G-D3-2400-MR 12GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
33.8% Below average
MC Read 11
MC Write 11
MC Mixed 9
30% 10.3 GB/s
SC Read 10.8
SC Write 11.9
SC Mixed 11.6
33% 11.4 GB/s
Latency 59
68% 59 ns
Poor: 26%
This bench: 33.8%
Great: 34%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MAXIMUS VI HERO Builds (Compare 2,499 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 77%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 64%
Destroyer

Motherboard: Asus MAXIMUS VI HERO - $190

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 89% - Excellent Total price: $600
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $296WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $218Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback