Today's hottest

Amazon Ebay

deals

CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD

TEST
YOUR PC

ADD TO PC
BUILD

Gigabyte GA-H370 HD3-CF

Performance Results


Gaming 48% Yacht	Desktop 96% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 43% Speed boat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 93.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics	44.2% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	188% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago.

System	Gigabyte H370HD3
Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-H370 HD3-CF (all builds)
Memory	10.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20190605
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Jun 30 '21 at 18:52
Run Duration	217 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	3%

Watch Gameplay: 1650 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (59^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-9700F-$266 54,980 User benchmarks, average bench 92% U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (56^th percentile)	93.7% Outstanding	Memory 86.1 1-Core 142 2-Core 283 93% 170 Pts	4-Core 544 8-Core 842 86% 693 Pts	64-Core 955 59% 955 Pts
Poor: 74% ↑ This bench: 93.7% Great: 100%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1650-$152 259,091 User benchmarks, average bench 43% Asus(1043 86B6) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2160 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 471.11 Performing above expectations (81^st percentile)	44.2% Average	Lighting 57.5 Reflection 59.1 Parallax 50.9 47% 55.8 fps	MRender 42.5 Gravity 52.4 Splatting 47.9 39% 47.6 fps
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 44.2% Great: 46%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston SA2000M8250G 250GB 42,173 User benchmarks, average bench 171% 95GB free (System drive) Firmware: S5Z42109 SusWrite @10s intervals: 451 165 318 274 267 273 MB/s Performing above expectations (62^nd percentile)	188% Outstanding	Read 1,493 Write 1169 Mixed 1,024 SusWrite 291 221% 994 MB/s	4K Read 57.4 4K Write 128 4K Mixed 74.1 250% 86.7 MB/s	DQ Read 811 DQ Write 671 DQ Mixed 66.1 234% 516 MB/s
Poor: 103% ↑ This bench: 188% Great: 236%
WDC WDS240G2G0B-00EPW0 240GB 85,321 User benchmarks, average bench 45% 24GB free Firmware: UJ400400 SusWrite @10s intervals: 216 129 152 147 141 143 MB/s Performing way above expectations (93^rd percentile)	53.8% Above average	Read 438 Write 268 Mixed 169 SusWrite 155 57% 258 MB/s	4K Read 21.7 4K Write 34.3 4K Mixed 16.9 73% 24.3 MB/s	DQ Read 121 DQ Write 101 DQ Mixed 36.5 48% 86.3 MB/s
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 53.8% Great: 55%
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016)-$30 1,120,098 User benchmarks, average bench 92% 132GB free Firmware: CC43 SusWrite @10s intervals: 147 134 150 149 150 151 MB/s Performing below expectations (28^th percentile)	82.7% Excellent	Read 141 Write 115 Mixed 79.5 SusWrite 147 89% 121 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 1.6 4K Mixed 0.7 141% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 60% ↑ This bench: 82.7% Great: 113%
Toshiba MQ01ABD100 1TB-$33 322,803 User benchmarks, average bench 47% 117GB free Firmware: AX1P5J SusWrite @10s intervals: 22 16 24 24 23 31 MB/s Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	23.5% Poor	Read 58.5 Write 55.6 Mixed 26.4 SusWrite 23.2 30% 40.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.2 4K Mixed 0.5 99% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 23.5% Great: 62%
Microsoft Virtual Disk 249GB 5 User benchmarks, average bench 27% 70GB free Firmware: 1.0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 15 7 8.2 10 11 11 MB/s Performing way above expectations (90^th percentile)	36.6% Below average	Read 117 Write 32.7 Mixed 32.7 SusWrite 10.5 35% 48.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1 4K Mixed 0.5 99% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 36.6% Great: 37%
WD Elements 25A2 1.5TB 2,275 User benchmarks, average bench 41% 113GB free, PID 25a2 Operating at USB 3.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 60 57 56 57 58 58 MB/s Performing below expectations (35^th percentile)	35.8% Below average	Read 68.2 Write 57.7 Mixed 50.7 SusWrite 57.8 78% 58.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 4.3 4K Mixed 0.3 159% 1.73 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 35.8% Great: 65%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 2x8GB 236,291 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz Performing above expectations (77^th percentile)	79.6% Very good	MC Read 33.2 MC Write 31.8 MC Mixed 24.2 85% 29.7 GB/s	SC Read 12.3 SC Write 24.9 SC Mixed 15.9 50% 17.7 GB/s	Latency 71.2 56% 71.2 ns
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 79.6% Great: 97%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	10	8	60	27"	1280 720	BNQ78E6 BenQ GW2780

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-H370 HD3-CF Builds (Compare 1,230 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 81%

Aircraft carrier

Desktop 90%

Nuclear submarine

Workstation 74%

Battleship

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-H370 HD3-CF

CPU
Core i7-8700Intel $145Bench 87%, 349,567 samples	287x
Core i5-8400Intel $85Bench 82%, 312,220 samples	222x
Core i5-9400FIntel $83Bench 85%, 299,482 samples	131x

GPU
RTX 2060Nvidia $140Bench 90%, 645,160 samples	89x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	80x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	73x

SSD
860 Evo 250GBSamsung $52Bench 104%, 296,814 samples	42x
A400 240GBKingston $25Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	34x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	32x

RAM
Fury 2666 C16 2x8GBHyperX $69Bench 82%, 134,977 samples	52x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 2666 C16 2x8GBCorsair $36Bench 77%, 131,007 samples	34x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $40Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	30x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 109% - Outstanding

Total price: $407

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169	Nvidia RTX 4060 $296	WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $155
Intel Core i5-12400F $111	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345	WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $218	Nvidia RTX 4070 $500	Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350