Asus RAMPAGE IV EXTREME

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 30%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 27%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (28th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 72 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics30% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive45% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (20%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus RAMPAGE IV EXTREME  (all builds)
Memory56.6 GB free of 64 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display3840 x 1600 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130829
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJan 15 '22 at 18:39
Run Duration247 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 20%

 PC Performing below expectations (28th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3930K-$280
LGA2011, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
76.6% Very good
Memory 85.1
1-Core 95
2-Core 191
72% 124 Pts
4-Core 368
8-Core 568
58% 468 Pts
64-Core 665
41% 665 Pts
Poor: 63%
This bench: 76.6%
Great: 85%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 680-$360
EVGA(3842 2686) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1215 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 456.71
Performing below potential (34th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
30% Poor
Lighting 34.3
Reflection 34.6
Parallax 47.7
28% 38.9 fps
MRender 47.3
Gravity 42.9
Splatting 36.4
34% 42.2 fps
Poor: 29%
This bench: 30%
Great: 35%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
OCZ AGILITY4 512GB
317GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.5.2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 177 182 180 177 177 182 MB/s
Performing below potential (4th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
45% Average
Read 175
Write 186
Mixed 148
SusWrite 179
39% 172 MB/s
4K Read 13.3
4K Write 37.3
4K Mixed 16.9
62% 22.5 MB/s
DQ Read 178
DQ Write 188
DQ Mixed 188
140% 185 MB/s
Poor: 50%
This bench: 45%
Great: 85%
ST16000NM001G-2KK103 16TB
10.5TB free
Firmware: SN03
SusWrite @10s intervals: 129 132 133 130 131 131 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
27.2% Poor
Read 239
Write 134
Mixed 124
SusWrite 131
35% 157 MB/s
4K Read 18.2
4K Write 8.3
4K Mixed 1.6
34% 9.37 MB/s
DQ Read 6.3
DQ Write 10.2
DQ Mixed 1.2
3% 5.9 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 27.2%
Great: 45%
ST16000NM001G-2KK103 16TB
9TB free
Firmware: SN03
SusWrite @10s intervals: 120 120 121 120 119 119 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
24.1% Poor
Read 206
Write 98.2
Mixed 99.8
SusWrite 120
29% 131 MB/s
4K Read 15.8
4K Write 9.1
4K Mixed 1.4
30% 8.77 MB/s
DQ Read 4.4
DQ Write 8
DQ Mixed 1.5
2% 4.63 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 24.1%
Great: 45%
Seagate Desktop HDD 6TB (2014)-$220
4TB free
Firmware: CC48
SusWrite @10s intervals: 81 137 139 130 135 137 MB/s
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
75.8% Very good
Read 138
Write 21.8
Mixed 66.4
SusWrite 126
65% 88.1 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 1
198% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 48%
This bench: 75.8%
Great: 118%
Amd-raid ST16000NM001G-2K 16TB
2.5TB free
Firmware: SN03
SusWrite @10s intervals: 128 132 132 129 131 130 MB/s
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
90.5% Outstanding
Read 178
Write 135
Mixed 107
SusWrite 130
101% 138 MB/s
4K Read 17.3
4K Write 6.2
4K Mixed 1.3
980% 8.27 MB/s
Poor: 32%
This bench: 90.5%
Great: 146%
Toshiba HDWR160 6TB
4TB free
Firmware: 0603
SusWrite @10s intervals: 74 67 68 68 72 70 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
53.8% Above average
Read 117
Write 66
Mixed 54.7
SusWrite 70.1
57% 77 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 1
164% 1 MB/s
Poor: 62%
This bench: 53.8%
Great: 129%
Toshiba X300 6TB-$78
2.5TB free
Firmware: FS2A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 119 122 121 119 121 120 MB/s
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
80.6% Excellent
Read 159
Write 119
Mixed 67.3
SusWrite 120
85% 116 MB/s
4K Read 4.2
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 1.1
338% 2.5 MB/s
Poor: 58%
This bench: 80.6%
Great: 109%
ST3000DM 001-9YN166 3TB
2.5TB free, PID 1153
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 48 44 44 44 46 45 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
23.5% Poor
Read 70.2
Write 19.6
Mixed 52.4
SusWrite 45
59% 46.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.7
63% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 23.5%
Great: 24%
SanDisk Cruzer 128GB
101GB free, PID 5530
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 15 15 15 16 15 16 MB/s
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
8.36% Terrible
Read 25.4
Write 15.4
Mixed 19.7
SusWrite 15.3
24% 19 MB/s
4K Read 3.1
4K Write 0.2
4K Mixed 0.7
42% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 4%
This bench: 8.36%
Great: 17%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance DDR3 1600 8x8GB
8 of 8 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing below potential (35th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
88.9% Excellent
MC Read 36
MC Write 36
MC Mixed 33
100% 35 GB/s
SC Read 13.8
SC Write 12
SC Mixed 11.6
36% 12.5 GB/s
Latency 71.8
56% 71.8 ns
Poor: 74%
This bench: 88.9%
Great: 98%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical RAMPAGE IV EXTREME Builds (Compare 1,575 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 42%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 37%
Jet ski

Motherboard: Asus RAMPAGE IV EXTREME - $589

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 61% - Good Total price: $1,163
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $289Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback