Asus P8P67

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (27th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 73 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 52.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics46.5% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (51%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
MotherboardAsus P8P67  (all builds)
Memory17.7 GB free of 24 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20110120
Uptime0.9 Days
Run DateJan 07 '22 at 16:26
Run Duration193 Seconds
Run User AUT-User
Background CPU 51%

 PC Performing below expectations (27th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-2400-$250
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 29,030,298 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
52.4% Above average
Memory 73.5
1-Core 95.3
2-Core 169
65% 113 Pts
4-Core 171
8-Core 309
29% 240 Pts
64-Core 239
15% 239 Pts
Poor: 42%
This bench: 52.4%
Great: 70%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 970-$200
CLim: 1455 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 466.85
Performing below potential (37th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
46.5% Average
Lighting 56
Reflection 67.9
Parallax 59.6
46% 61.2 fps
MRender 67.7
Gravity 59
Splatting 53.1
48% 59.9 fps
Poor: 43%
This bench: 46.5%
Great: 54%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue 2TB (2015)-$58
1.5TB free (System drive)
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 50 62 119 52 47 35 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
31.8% Below average
Read 50.2
Write 49.2
Mixed 14.5
SusWrite 60.6
32% 43.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.3
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.6
100% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 31.8%
Great: 84%
WD Elements 1TB
670GB free, PID 10b8
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 69 67 66 62 62 79 MB/s
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
36.1% Below average
Read 110
Write 101
Mixed 54.2
SusWrite 67.6
108% 83.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.8
87% 1 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 36.1%
Great: 43%
WD 10EAVS External 1TB
99GB free, PID 1003
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 28 31 30 30 30 30 MB/s
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
15.2% Very poor
Read 31.8
Write 27.8
Mixed 23.5
SusWrite 29.9
38% 28.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.8
73% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 15.2%
Great: 22%
Intenso External USB 3.0 3TB
353GB free, PID 0701
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 76 67 66 61 59 59 MB/s
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
39% Below average
Read 134
Write 95.7
Mixed 51
SusWrite 64.8
107% 86.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.8
88% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 39%
Great: 72%
Intenso External USB 3.0 3TB
36GB free, PID 0539
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 13 9.5 8.5 19 21 24 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
4.75% Terrible
Read 2.5
Write 25.7
Mixed 5
SusWrite 15.9
19% 12.3 MB/s
4K Read 0
4K Write 0.3
4K Mixed 0.3
20% 0.2 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 4.75%
Great: 70%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMX4GX3M1A1333C9 Hynix HMT41GU6MFR8C-PB CMX4GX3M1A1333C9 Hynix HMT41GU6MFR8C-PB 24GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 8192, 4096, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
47.2% Average
MC Read 16
MC Write 18.1
MC Mixed 15.8
48% 16.6 GB/s
SC Read 11.4
SC Write 14.7
SC Mixed 15.2
39% 13.8 GB/s
Latency 93.6
43% 93.6 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P8P67 Builds (Compare 1,497 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 36%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft

Motherboard: Asus P8P67 - $120

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 54% - Above average Total price: $666
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $128Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4070 $542Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $29
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback