VIA P4VT8+

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing CPU, GPU, SSD, RAM
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (24th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 76 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory2.5GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 2.5GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 11 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
SystemVIA P4VT8+  (all builds)
Motherboard P4VT8+
Memory1.7 GB free of 2.5 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20040907
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 06 '22 at 03:55
Run Duration193 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU9%

 PC Performing below expectations (24th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Pentium 4 2.40GHz
FC-478, 1 CPU, 1 cores, 1 threads
Base clock 2.35 GHz
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
1-Core 11.1
2-Core 9.4
5% 10.2 Pts
4-Core 3.8
8-Core 6.2
1% 5 Pts
64-Core 9.3
1% 9.3 Pts
Poor: 10% Great: 40%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce 6200
Device(0000 0000) 128MB
Ram: 128MB, Driver: 309.08
Relative performance n/a - atypical extreme
Poor: 0% Great: 0%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD WD1600AAJB-00PVA0 160GB
124GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 01.03E01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 16 16 16 32 33 31 MB/s
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
18.8% Very poor
Read 40.8
Write 25
Mixed 27.2
SusWrite 24
22% 29.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 1
165% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 18.8%
Great: 46%
SAMSUNG MP0804H 80GB
36GB free, PID 2507
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 7.8 11 9.6 12 11 11 MB/s
Performing below expectations (20th percentile)
7.59% Terrible
Read 17
Write 14.8
Mixed 13.8
SusWrite 10.4
18% 14 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 0.6
52% 0.63 MB/s
Poor: 8%
This bench: 7.59%
Great: 12%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $160
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback