Gigabyte GA-G1.Sniper B5-CF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 67.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics1.1% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive41.6% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (35%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemGigabyte G1.Sniper B5
MotherboardGigabyte GA-G1.Sniper B5-CF  (all builds)
Memory19.7 GB free of 24 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colores,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140916
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 08 '21 at 02:02
Run Duration315 Seconds
Run User MEX-User
Background CPU 35%

 PC Performing as expected (46th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4790-$132
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
67.2% Good
Memory 78
1-Core 101
2-Core 186
70% 122 Pts
4-Core 304
8-Core 550
51% 427 Pts
64-Core 582
36% 582 Pts
Poor: 58%
This bench: 67.2%
Great: 80%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 5450
Sapphire(174B E164) 1GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.301.1901.0
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
1.1% Terrible
Lighting 1.2
Reflection 2.5
Parallax 1.6
1% 1.77 fps
MRender 1.9
Gravity 0.9
Splatting 2
1% 1.6 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.1%
Great: 1%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 120GB-$28
13GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFK71E0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 81 44 3.1 9 36 11 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
41.6% Average
Read 349
Write 41.3
Mixed 58.1
SusWrite 30.7
26% 120 MB/s
4K Read 30.1
4K Write 24.7
4K Mixed 11.5
73% 22.1 MB/s
DQ Read 169
DQ Write 37.1
DQ Mixed 0
27% 68.6 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 41.6%
Great: 85%
WD Re 2TB-$38
2TB free
Firmware: 01.01D02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 128 124 135 130 131 128 MB/s
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
74.1% Very good
Read 129
Write 122
Mixed 110
SusWrite 129
91% 123 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.9
169% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 74.1%
Great: 83%
ADATA HV620 2TB
1.5TB free, PID a31a
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 20 20 21 21 21 21 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
15.3% Very poor
Read 31.6
Write 18.8
Mixed 19.2
SusWrite 20.6
29% 22.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.7
94% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 15.3%
Great: 47%
SAMSUNG MP0804H 80GB
3GB free, PID 2507
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 26 27 25 25 26 26 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
12% Very poor
Read 22.2
Write 21.3
Mixed 19.5
SusWrite 25.8
30% 22.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.6
56% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 8%
This bench: 12%
Great: 12%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown DDR3 1600 3x8GB
3 of 4 slots used
24GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
49.9% Average
MC Read 19.7
MC Write 21.2
MC Mixed 12.9
51% 17.9 GB/s
SC Read 9.5
SC Write 16
SC Mixed 11.7
35% 12.4 GB/s
Latency 84.4
47% 84.4 ns
Poor: 33%
This bench: 49.9%
Great: 59%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 3: 0R 0G 3B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
3% 6% 51 13 9 60 20.9" 1680 1050 GWY0889 FPD2185W
History: Score 1: 0R 0G 1B | Score 3: 0R 1G 0B | Score 3: 0R 0G 3B
Typical GA-G1.Sniper B5-CF Builds (Compare 765 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 34%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 27%
Raft

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-G1.Sniper B5-CF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 53% - Above average Total price: $494
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $160
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback