Today's hottest deals

Samsung 900X3C/900X3D/900X4C/900X4D

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 45%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (25th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 75 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 47.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics3.04% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive24.1% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (22%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemSamsung 900X3C/900X3D/900X4C/900X4D  (all builds)
MotherboardSAMSUNG SAMSUNG_NP1234567890
Memory4.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20131118
Uptime3.7 Days
Run DateJan 01 '22 at 09:24
Run Duration178 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU 22%

 PC Performing below expectations (25th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3317U-$225
CPU Socket - U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 1.7 GHz, turbo 1.7 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
47.2% Average
Memory 75.6
1-Core 44.2
2-Core 66.4
43% 62.1 Pts
4-Core 112
8-Core 112
15% 112 Pts
64-Core 111
7% 111 Pts
Poor: 29%
This bench: 47.2%
Great: 57%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz)
Sanyo(144D C0D3) 2GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.4276
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
3.04% Terrible
Lighting 3.7
Reflection 1.8
Parallax 2.6
3% 2.7 fps
MRender 4.4
Gravity 2.2
Splatting 4.5
3% 3.7 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 3.04%
Great: 4%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Sandisk U100 128GB
23GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 10.01.04
SusWrite @10s intervals: 22 25 19 20 20 23 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
24.1% Poor
Read 387
Write 38.9
Mixed 27.3
SusWrite 21.5
25% 119 MB/s
4K Read 10.3
4K Write 3.5
4K Mixed 5.5
24% 6.43 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 24.1%
Great: 55%
SMI USB DISK 126GB
6GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 16 12 9.6 12 11 9.2 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
6.09% Terrible
Read 18.2
Write 20.9
Mixed 11.9
SusWrite 11.7
21% 15.7 MB/s
4K Read 2.5
4K Write 0.1
4K Mixed 0.1
16% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 6.09%
Great: 47%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471B5273DH0-CK0 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing below potential (17th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
45.5% Average
MC Read 16.1
MC Write 16.9
MC Mixed 16.7
47% 16.6 GB/s
SC Read 10.3
SC Write 9.2
SC Mixed 10.7
29% 10.1 GB/s
Latency 89.2
45% 89.2 ns
Poor: 24%
This bench: 45.5%
Great: 57%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 900X3C/900X3D/900X4C/900X4D Builds (Compare 60 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 47%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk

System: Samsung 900X3C/900X3D/900X4C/900X4D

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 50% - Above average Total price: $225
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $278WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback