Today's hottest deals

Gigabyte GA-X570 AORUS ELITE WIFI

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 41%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 63%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 37%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (19th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 81 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 55.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics68.4% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive46.4% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (94%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-X570 AORUS ELITE WIFI  (all builds)
Memory17.1 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191206
Uptime0.8 Days
Run DateJun 16 '22 at 06:10
Run Duration336 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 94%
Watch Gameplay: 1660 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 3600-$88
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.95 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
55.9% Above average
Memory 54.7
1-Core 76.7
2-Core 166
54% 99.2 Pts
4-Core 307
8-Core 468
48% 388 Pts
64-Core 599
37% 599 Pts
Poor: 73%
This bench: 55.9%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660-$209
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 497.29
Performing below potential (51st percentile) - GPU OC Guide
68.4% Good
Lighting 90.5
Reflection 2.9
Parallax 76.6
74% 56.7 fps
MRender 65.6
Gravity 77.2
Splatting 69.3
58% 70.7 fps
Poor: 62%
This bench: 68.4%
Great: 73%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Black SN750 NVMe PCIe M.2 2TB (2019)-$145
854GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 102430WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 5.2 2.8 5.6 7.3 2.4 6 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (0th percentile)
46.4% Average
Read 643
Write 6.7
Mixed 30.4
SusWrite 4.9
36% 171 MB/s
4K Read 48.7
4K Write 0.8
4K Mixed 1.6
76% 17 MB/s
Poor: 183%
This bench: 46.4%
Great: 320%
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2018)-$54
568GB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 6 6.3 2.5 7.6 1.5 4.5 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 53% Great: 106%
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2018)-$54
669GB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.4 4.2 4.7 4.7 3.8 4.9 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 53% Great: 106%
Seagate Barracuda 8TB (2017)-$113
1.5TB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 8.5 6.7 2.5 8.6 13 15 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 39% Great: 90%
Amd-raid WDS100T3XHC-00SJ 1TB
676GB free
Firmware: 102000WD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 12 8.9 7.7 19 6.6 12 MB/s
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
150% Outstanding
Read 496
Write 7.8
Mixed 11.5
SusWrite 11
94% 132 MB/s
4K Read 50
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 8.2
3,011% 19.7 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 150%
Great: 310%
Seagate BUP Portable 5TB
3TB free
Firmware: 1707
SusWrite @10s intervals: 102 100 105 103 107 87 MB/s
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
50.6% Above average
Read 75.3
Write 49.1
Mixed 58.3
SusWrite 101
52% 70.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.3
103% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 50.6%
Great: 69%
SMI USB DISK 126GB
31GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 10 0.4 0.4 7.4 1.4 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
8.96% Terrible
Read 22.9
Write 22.6
Mixed 28.4
SusWrite 8
28% 20.5 MB/s
4K Read 4.8
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 0.8
76% 2.17 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 8.96%
Great: 47%
VendorCo ProductCode 2TB
2TB free, PID 1234
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 0.4 0.7 0.3 0.6 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Read 26.4
Write 17.9
Mixed 4.2
SusWrite 0.6
14% 12.3 MB/s
4K Read 3.7
4K Mixed 0
21% 1.85 MB/s
Poor: 3% Great: 11%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x16GB-$110
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
55.2% Above average
MC Read 24.7
MC Write 16.5
MC Mixed 21.3
60% 20.8 GB/s
SC Read 11.8
SC Write 11
SC Mixed 16.3
37% 13 GB/s
Latency 144
28% 144 ns
Poor: 59%
This bench: 55.2%
Great: 114%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-X570 AORUS ELITE WIFI Builds (Compare 6,853 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 182%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 104%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 182%
UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-X570 AORUS ELITE WIFI

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 74% - Very good Total price: $1,004
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $278WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback