PC Status | Overall this PC is performing as expected (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
Processor | With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 43.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average. |
Graphics | 23.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 57.6% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications. |
Memory | 128GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 128GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
System | HP Z800 Workstation (all builds) |
Motherboard | Hewlett-Packard 0AECh |
Memory | 123.6 GB free of 128.002 GB @ 1.1 GHz |
Display | 1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colori |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20130715 |
Uptime | 0 Days |
Run Date | Dec 28 '21 at 11:31 |
Run Duration | 342 Seconds |
Run User | POL-User |
Background CPU | 0% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Xeon X5550
CPU0 PROCESSOR, 1 CPU, 1 cores, 1 threads
Base clock 2.65 GHz, turbo 2.65 GHz (avg)
|
43.7%
Average
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia Quadro M4000
Nvidia(10DE 1153) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 772 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 461.72
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
23.3%
Poor
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Samsung 840 Evo 250GB-$95
66GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXT0BB6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 100 105 116 123 117 118 MB/s
|
57.6%
Above average
|
|||
Samsung 870 QVO 1TB-$80
224GB free
Firmware: SVQ01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 106 98 108 117 118 101 MB/s
|
56.7%
Above average
|
|||
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$38
284GB free
Firmware: CC25
SusWrite @10s intervals: 99 105 116 126 125 131 MB/s
|
83.6%
Excellent
|
|||
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 500GB-$23
219GB free
Firmware: HP74
SusWrite @10s intervals: 65 71 72 76 76 75 MB/s
|
54.4%
Above average
|
|||
Hitachi Deskstar P7K500 500GB-$159
245GB free
Firmware: GM4OA5BA
SusWrite @10s intervals: 66 70 69 71 72 71 MB/s
|
41%
Average
|
|||
JMicron Generic 500GB
45GB free, PID 0578
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 102 96 107 114 113 111 MB/s
|
143%
Outstanding
|
|||
JMicron Generic 1TB
267GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 97 94 107 110 112 111 MB/s
|
143%
Outstanding
|
|||
JMicron Tech 2TB
611GB free, PID 0562
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 81 74 85 86 88 78 MB/s
|
144%
Outstanding
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
CPU: Intel Xeon X56501stBench 64%, 7,756 samples | 318x |
CPU: Intel Xeon X56751stBench 68%, 4,275 samples | 189x |
CPU: Intel Xeon X56701stBench 67%, 4,676 samples | 180x |
GPU | |
---|---|
Quadro 4000NvidiaBench 7%, 8,609 samples | 161x |
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples | 88x |
Quadro 5000NvidiaBench 10%, 751 samples | 68x |
SSD | |
---|---|
WDS100T2B0A-00SM50 1TBWDCBench 98%, 74,123 samples | 38x |
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $94Bench 112%, 695,664 samples | 34x |
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples | 34x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER |