Today's hottest deals

Asus H170 PRO GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 47%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 43%
Speed boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (32nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 68 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 68.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics62.1% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (17%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsus H170 PRO GAMING  (all builds)
Memory9.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display2560 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20151023
Uptime5.3 Days
Run DateDec 28 '21 at 02:22
Run Duration148 Seconds
Run User SGP-User
Background CPU 17%
Watch Gameplay: 1080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6700K-$127
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
68.7% Good
Memory 74.6
1-Core 76.2
2-Core 170
61% 107 Pts
4-Core 338
8-Core 616
57% 478 Pts
64-Core 678
42% 678 Pts
Poor: 70%
This bench: 68.7%
Great: 90%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-$195
Asus(1043 859B) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 2902 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 461.09
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
62.1% Good
Lighting 72.1
Reflection 85.8
Parallax 74.7
59% 77.5 fps
MRender 78.3
Gravity 92.1
Splatting 81.4
69% 83.9 fps
Poor: 93%
This bench: 62.1%
Great: 110%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
PNY CS900 480GB-$38
446GB free
Firmware: CS900112
SusWrite @10s intervals: 281 369 192 137 137 139 MB/s
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
93.5% Outstanding
Read 479
Write 428
Mixed 347
SusWrite 209
82% 366 MB/s
4K Read 36.8
4K Write 93.7
4K Mixed 39.5
156% 56.7 MB/s
DQ Read 300
DQ Write 331
DQ Mixed 221
192% 284 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 93.5%
Great: 102%
1TB 1TB
895GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SSD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 241 321 359 290 143 145 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 3% Great: 100%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
KLEVV KD48GU880-32A160U 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
68% Good
MC Read 27.8
MC Write 27.4
MC Mixed 20.4
72% 25.2 GB/s
SC Read 12.2
SC Write 21.4
SC Mixed 16.2
47% 16.6 GB/s
Latency 91.3
44% 91.3 ns
Poor: 68%
This bench: 68%
Great: 112%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H170 PRO GAMING Builds (Compare 2,189 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 61%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 52%
Yacht

Motherboard: Asus H170 PRO GAMING - $130

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 60% - Above average Total price: $763
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback