Today's hottest deals

AZW GTR

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 25%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (66th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 34 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 93.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics17.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive222% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemAZW GTR  (all builds)
MotherboardAZW GTR
Memory25.4 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20220120
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateMay 01 '22 at 00:37
Run Duration138 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing above expectations (66th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 4900H
FP6, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
93.6% Outstanding
Memory 75.2
1-Core 151
2-Core 294
93% 173 Pts
4-Core 599
8-Core 1,084
101% 842 Pts
64-Core 1,324
82% 1,324 Pts
Poor: 48%
This bench: 93.6%
Great: 94%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX Vega 8 4000 (iGPU)
AMD(1002 0123) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 22.3.1
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
17.5% Very poor
Lighting 22
Reflection 20.5
Parallax 30.9
18% 24.5 fps
MRender 15.1
Gravity 25.1
Splatting 20
16% 20.1 fps
Poor: 8%
This bench: 17.5%
Great: 17%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SNVS500G 500GB
328GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S8H40104
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1079 1069 1283 1700 1394 264 MB/s
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
222% Outstanding
Read 1,580
Write 1,467
Mixed 1,141
SusWrite 1,131
299% 1,330 MB/s
4K Read 53
4K Write 161
4K Mixed 29.1
203% 81.1 MB/s
DQ Read 707
DQ Write 706
DQ Mixed 488
427% 633 MB/s
Poor: 108%
This bench: 222%
Great: 244%
1TB 1TB
826GB free
Firmware: V7.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
3.04% Terrible
Read 10
Write 0.2
Mixed 0.2
SusWrite 0.5
2% 2.72 MB/s
4K Read 0.2
4K Write 0.2
4K Mixed 0.2
34% 0.2 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.04%
Great: 100%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial CT16G4SFS832A.C8FE 2x16GB
2 of 2 slots used
32GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
84.1% Excellent
MC Read 36.7
MC Write 30.5
MC Mixed 26.2
89% 31.1 GB/s
SC Read 19.4
SC Write 27.8
SC Mixed 19.5
64% 22.2 GB/s
Latency 89.9
44% 89.9 ns
Poor: 62%
This bench: 84.1%
Great: 103%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GTR Builds (Compare 113 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 22%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 21%
Surfboard

System: AZW GTR

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback