bin bin

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 61.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Virtual machine detected, hardware performance reduced. Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemVMware, VMware7,1
MotherboardIntel 440BX Desktop Reference Platform
Memory23 GB free of 32 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200625
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 22 '21 at 10:30
Run Duration378 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 14%

 PC Performing as expected (51st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2660 0
CPU 0, 3 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 2.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
61.7% Good
Memory 75.4
1-Core 68.8
2-Core 138
56% 94.2 Pts
4-Core 260
8-Core 411
41% 335 Pts
64-Core 377
23% 377 Pts
Poor: 26%
This bench: 61.7%
Great: 62%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Vmware Virtual disk 215GB
60GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2.0
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,468
Write 1,970
Mixed 2,252
497% 2,230 MB/s
4K Read 54.2
4K Write 49.2
4K Mixed 49.7
172% 51 MB/s
DQ Read 298
DQ Write 216
DQ Mixed 237
183% 250 MB/s
Poor: 34% Great: 86%
Vmware Virtual disk 537GB
187GB free
Firmware: 2.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 353 324 338 343 440 480 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 34% Great: 95%
Seagate Expansion 1TB
892GB free, PID 231a
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 17 18 18 15 15 27 MB/s
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
14.9% Very poor
Read 30.6
Write 27.2
Mixed 22.8
SusWrite 18.1
32% 24.7 MB/s
4K Read 1.5
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 1
108% 1.5 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 14.9%
Great: 50%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
VMware Virtual RAM VMW-16384MB 2x16GB
2 of 128 slots used
32GB DIMM DRAM
Performing below potential (31st percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
59.1% Above average
MC Read 25
MC Write 21.4
MC Mixed 22.8
66% 23.1 GB/s
SC Read 11.7
SC Write 5.7
SC Mixed 6.6
23% 8 GB/s
Latency 89.4
45% 89.4 ns
Poor: 30%
This bench: 59.1%
Great: 147%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical bin Builds (Compare 24,526 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Disqualified System: bin bin

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $325
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $160
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback