bin bin

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (17th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 83 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 25.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Virtual machine detected, hardware performance reduced. Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardMicrosoft Virtual Machine
Memory55.4 GB free of 64 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170602
Uptime6.1 Days
Run DateJun 18 '20 at 09:38
Run Duration220 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 14%

 PC Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2660 0
None, 2 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 2.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
25.6% Poor
Memory 27.8
1-Core 37.4
2-Core 71.2
26% 45.5 Pts
4-Core 126
8-Core 197
20% 162 Pts
64-Core 248
15% 248 Pts
Poor: 26%
This bench: 25.6%
Great: 62%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Virtual HD 136GB
90GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.1.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 28 25 28 25 34 25 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 37% Great: 78%
Virtual HD 86GB
1GB free
Firmware: 1.1.0
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
Read 171
Write 105
Mixed 110
28% 129 MB/s
4K Read 6.3
4K Write 9.8
4K Mixed 8.1
25% 8.07 MB/s
DQ Read 41.4
DQ Write 39.4
DQ Mixed 41.6
31% 40.8 MB/s
Poor: 39% Great: 75%
Microsoft Virtual Disk 4.5TB
593GB free
Firmware: 1.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 33 30 34 37 36 37 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
16.1% Very poor
Read 21
Write 31.6
Mixed 27.3
SusWrite 34.4
21% 28.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.7
140% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 7%
This bench: 16.1%
Great: 57%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 64GB
null MHz
1024, 32767, 31745 MB
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
45.1% Average
MC Read 25.7
MC Write 14.3
MC Mixed 16.4
54% 18.8 GB/s
SC Read 4.5
SC Write 2.7
SC Mixed 3.3
10% 3.5 GB/s
Latency 268
15% 268 ns
Poor: 27%
This bench: 45.1%
Great: 124%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical bin Builds (Compare 24,526 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Disqualified System: bin bin

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $325
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $160
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback