Acer Aspire TC-865

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 38%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 95%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 33%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (65th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 35 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 88.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics33.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive304% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemAcer Aspire TC-865  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer Aspire TC-865
Memory10.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20200408
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 07 '21 at 21:12
Run Duration272 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing above expectations (65th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-8400-$114
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
88.5% Excellent
Memory 90.3
1-Core 122
2-Core 236
84% 150 Pts
4-Core 467
8-Core 701
73% 584 Pts
64-Core 661
41% 661 Pts
Poor: 61%
This bench: 88.5%
Great: 89%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD HD 7950-$290
Gigabyte(1458 254C) 3GB
CLim: 1000 MHz, MLim: 1250 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 20.10.35.02
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
33.3% Below average
Lighting 44.8
Reflection 36.6
Parallax 62
36% 47.8 fps
MRender 32.3
Gravity 44.4
Splatting 25.3
27% 34 fps
Poor: 25%
This bench: 33.3%
Great: 32%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
MSI M470 1TB
839GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EGFM13.2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1947 2032 2036 2059 2081 2070 MB/s
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
304% Outstanding
Read 1,162
Write 1,783
Mixed 1,540
SusWrite 2,037
371% 1,631 MB/s
4K Read 43.6
4K Write 160
4K Mixed 74.2
246% 92.5 MB/s
DQ Read 1,401
DQ Write 1,159
DQ Mixed 1,361
997% 1,307 MB/s
Poor: 207%
This bench: 304%
Great: 504%
SSK Storage 256GB
233GB free
Firmware: 1.00
SusWrite @10s intervals: 381 300 296 300 296 301 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
83.5% Excellent
Read 339
Write 527
Mixed 414
SusWrite 312
90% 398 MB/s
4K Read 27
4K Write 75.8
4K Mixed 37.6
129% 46.8 MB/s
DQ Read 239
DQ Write 241
DQ Mixed 254
187% 245 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 83.5%
Great: 83%
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016)-$39
610GB free
Firmware: CC43
SusWrite @10s intervals: 178 178 178 180 179 180 MB/s
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
103% Outstanding
Read 180
Write 178
Mixed 78.7
SusWrite 179
112% 154 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.6
132% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 103%
Great: 113%
Seagate ST2000VM003-1CT164 2TB
1TB free
Firmware: ES22
SusWrite @10s intervals: 149 157 153 158 156 164 MB/s
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
86.5% Excellent
Read 146
Write 144
Mixed 67.8
SusWrite 156
94% 128 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.7
127% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 45%
This bench: 86.5%
Great: 100%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 3TB-$75
1.5TB free
Firmware: CC24
SusWrite @10s intervals: 154 160 152 160 162 163 MB/s
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
90.1% Outstanding
Read 155
Write 115
Mixed 32.7
SusWrite 159
83% 115 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 3.2
4K Mixed 0.3
130% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 90.1%
Great: 113%
WD Green 2TB (2009)-$113
112GB free
Firmware: 01.00A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 52 55 54 56 55 56 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
35.7% Below average
Read 69.4
Write 68.5
Mixed 57.2
SusWrite 54.5
46% 62.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.6
135% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 35.7%
Great: 60%
USB SanDisk 3.2Gen1 123GB
115GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 31 30 27 23 22 21 MB/s
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
29% Poor
Read 95.9
Write 25.7
Mixed 45.7
SusWrite 25.8
55% 48.3 MB/s
4K Read 4.9
4K Write 2.7
4K Mixed 2.8
205% 3.47 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 29%
Great: 44%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 8ATF1G64AZ-2G6E1 16GB
2666, 2666 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
83.3% Excellent
MC Read 31.2
MC Write 34
MC Mixed 24.2
85% 29.8 GB/s
SC Read 14.1
SC Write 34.3
SC Mixed 25
70% 24.5 GB/s
Latency 66.8
60% 66.8 ns
Poor: 49%
This bench: 83.3%
Great: 86%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Aspire TC-865 Builds (Compare 265 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Aspire TC-865

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 105% - Outstanding Total price: $114
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $168Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $234Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $397
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback