Today's hottest deals

Gigabyte GA-X299 AORUS Gaming 3 Pro-CF

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (48th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 52 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics110% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
SystemGigabyte X299 AORUS Gaming 3 Pro
MotherboardGigabyte GA-X299 AORUS Gaming 3 Pro-CF  (all builds)
Memory9.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20180625
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 07 '23 at 12:37
Run Duration199 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU8%
Watch Gameplay: 2070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (48th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7800X-$204
, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.95 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
77.1% Very good
Memory 71.5
1-Core 122
2-Core 244
79% 146 Pts
4-Core 444
8-Core 741
72% 593 Pts
64-Core 849
53% 849 Pts
Poor: 69%
This bench: 77.1%
Great: 87%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2070-$200
Gainward(10B0 1F07) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2190 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 531.68
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
110% Outstanding
Lighting 138
Reflection 120
Parallax 139
112% 132 fps
MRender 185
Gravity 133
Splatting 111
113% 143 fps
Poor: 93%
This bench: 110%
Great: 112%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 EVO M.2 1TB
865GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT24B6Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 493
Write 297
Mixed 292
80% 361 MB/s
4K Read 30.2
4K Write 83.7
4K Mixed 39.8
141% 51.2 MB/s
DQ Read 387
DQ Write 325
DQ Mixed 272
227% 328 MB/s
Poor: 81% Great: 133%
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$80
465GB free
Firmware: RVT01B6Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 502
Write 469
Mixed 451
106% 474 MB/s
4K Read 38.1
4K Write 85.7
4K Mixed 50.4
168% 58.1 MB/s
DQ Read 386
DQ Write 336
DQ Mixed 356
268% 359 MB/s
Poor: 74% Great: 129%
USB DISK 2.0 16GB
13GB free, PID 5645
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Read 22.6
Write 0.2
Mixed 4.2
7% 9 MB/s
4K Read 4.7
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
17% 1.57 MB/s
Poor: 5% Great: 6%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 8ATF1G64AZ-2G6E1 16GB
2666, 2666 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (7th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
49.1% Average
MC Read 15.4
MC Write 24.2
MC Mixed 14
51% 17.9 GB/s
SC Read 7.5
SC Write 19.9
SC Mixed 9.3
35% 12.2 GB/s
Latency 98
41% 98 ns
Poor: 49%
This bench: 49.1%
Great: 86%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-X299 AORUS Gaming 3 Pro-CF Builds (Compare 226 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 82%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 77%
Battleship

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-X299 AORUS Gaming 3 Pro-CF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 90% - Outstanding Total price: $519
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $218Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback