HP 400-337d

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 1% Tree trunk	Desktop 63% Destroyer	Workstation 1% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (80th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 20 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 68.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	3.26% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.

Sub-optimal background CPU (15%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	HP 400-337d (all builds)
Motherboard	Hewlett-Packard 2AF7
Memory	1.3 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 8.1
BIOS Date	20140415
Uptime	0.9 Days
Run Date	Sep 01 '17 at 02:35
Run Duration	160 Seconds
Run User	SGP-User
Background CPU	15%

PC Performing above expectations (80^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i3-4150-$42 36,627 User benchmarks, average bench 55% , 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	68.5% Good	Memory 93.6 1-Core 97.2 2-Core 164 72% 118 Pts	4-Core 252 8-Core 260 34% 256 Pts	64-Core 261 16% 261 Pts
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 68.5% Great: 68%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD 4400 (Desktop 1.15 GHz) 64,721 User benchmarks, average bench 3% HP(103C 2AF7) 2GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.3379 Performing above expectations (73^rd percentile)	3.26% Terrible	Lighting 3.4 Reflection 5.46 Parallax 4.25 3% 4.37 fps	MRender 4.48 Gravity 2.33 Splatting 7.61 4% 4.81 fps
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 3.26% Great: 3%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
Toshiba DT01ACA050 500GB-$25 163,843 User benchmarks, average bench 75% 280GB free (System drive) Firmware: MS1OA750 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing as expected (59^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 141 141 74 (03) Spinup time 130 130 12896436400 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 723 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 118 118 33 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 1775 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 722 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 724 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 100 100 724 (C2) HDA temperature 162 162 176095297573 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0	82.7% Excellent	Read 147 Write 141 Mixed 128 104% 139 MB/s	4K Read 0.51 4K Write 1.68 4K Mixed 0.16 70% 0.79 MB/s
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 82.7% Great: 103%
iXpand Flash Drive 32GB 330 User benchmarks, average bench 24% 30GB free, PID cffa Operating at USB 3.0 Speed Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	35.6% Below average	Read 88.7 Write 67.3 Mixed 73.5 95% 76.5 MB/s	4K Read 6.34 4K Write 2.13 4K Mixed 1.66 152% 3.38 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 35.6% Great: 36%
SanDisk Ultra Flair USB 3.0 16GB-$8 10,598 User benchmarks, average bench 22% 12GB free, PID 5591 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	47.4% Average	Read 135 Write 88.3 Mixed 66.2 113% 96.6 MB/s	4K Read 5.68 4K Write 2.35 4K Mixed 1.63 156% 3.22 MB/s
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 47.4% Great: 32%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M378B5173DB0-CK0 1x4GB 7,467 User benchmarks, average bench 28% 1 of 2 slots used 4GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing as expected (52^nd percentile)	28.4% Poor	MC Read 9.6 MC Write 9 MC Mixed 8 25% 8.87 GB/s	SC Read 6.7 SC Write 8 SC Mixed 7.4 21% 7.37 GB/s	Latency 60.8 66% 60.8 ns
Poor: 19% ↑ This bench: 28.4% Great: 33%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

HP 400-337d

Performance Results

PC Performing above expectations (80th percentile)

System Memory Latency Ladder

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

Feedback

PC Performing above expectations (80^th percentile)