Today's hottest deals

Asus ROG STRIX B550-F GAMING (WI-FI)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 76%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 98%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 95%
Nuclear submarine
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 92.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics75.5% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive191% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
MotherboardAsus ROG STRIX B550-F GAMING (WI-FI)  (all builds)
Memory51 GB free of 64 GB @ 3.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20210810
Uptime3.7 Days
Run DateDec 07 '21 at 01:33
Run Duration320 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU1%
Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (58th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 3950X-$486
AM4, 1 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
92.8% Outstanding
Memory 86.2
1-Core 145
2-Core 288
94% 173 Pts
4-Core 531
8-Core 1,118
96% 825 Pts
64-Core 2,855
177% 2,855 Pts
Poor: 79%
This bench: 92.8%
Great: 97%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$278
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 472.47
Performing below potential (27th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
75.5% Very good
Lighting 92.7
Reflection 104
Parallax 95.6
76% 97.5 fps
MRender 92.5
Gravity 90.8
Splatting 93.1
76% 92.1 fps
Poor: 71%
This bench: 75.5%
Great: 88%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$74
137GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B7QCXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 556 316 307 295 291 291 MB/s
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
191% Outstanding
Read 1,945
Write 1,280
Mixed 527
SusWrite 343
225% 1,024 MB/s
4K Read 39.8
4K Write 114
4K Mixed 52.5
188% 68.6 MB/s
DQ Read 850
DQ Write 708
DQ Mixed 579
488% 712 MB/s
Poor: 142%
This bench: 191%
Great: 236%
WD VelociRaptor 500GB-$70
320GB free
Firmware: 04.06A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 160 158 159 158 159 161 MB/s
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
95% Outstanding
Read 171
Write 139
Mixed 99.9
SusWrite 159
105% 142 MB/s
4K Read 1.8
4K Write 4.5
4K Mixed 1.5
325% 2.6 MB/s
Poor: 61%
This bench: 95%
Great: 113%
WD Red 4TB (2013)-$85
373GB free
Firmware: 82.00A82
SusWrite @10s intervals: 126 127 130 130 130 129 MB/s
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
76.2% Very good
Read 136
Write 132
Mixed 93.5
SusWrite 128
90% 123 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 3
4K Mixed 1
200% 1.6 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 76.2%
Great: 100%
WD WD4005FZBX-00K5WB0 4TB
2.5TB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 218 214 219 214 219 215 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 76% Great: 136%
WD WD6003FZBX-00K5WB0 6TB
527GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 136 136 144 136 134 144 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 78% Great: 138%
WD Game Drive 5TB
3TB free, PID 262f
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 99 98 99 98 99 98 MB/s
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
50.5% Above average
Read 107
Write 98.8
Mixed 71.8
SusWrite 98.7
126% 94.1 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 4.3
4K Mixed 0.7
174% 2 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 50.5%
Great: 66%
TOSHIBA HDWE140 4TB
1.5TB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 90 93 96 94 94 95 MB/s
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
51.7% Above average
Read 144
Write 148
Mixed 70
SusWrite 93.6
149% 114 MB/s
4K Read 14.3
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 1.2
172% 5.93 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 51.7%
Great: 70%
Samsung SSD 850 PRO 256G 256GB
194GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 405 407 407 405 407 407 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
271% Outstanding
Read 392
Write 406
Mixed 323
SusWrite 407
522% 382 MB/s
4K Read 21.6
4K Write 39.1
4K Mixed 27.3
2,339% 29.3 MB/s
DQ Read 23.7
DQ Write 55.2
DQ Mixed 31.4
3,034% 36.8 MB/s
Poor: 143%
This bench: 271%
Great: 271%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 3600 C16 4x16GB
4 of 4 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3600 MHz
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
114% Outstanding
MC Read 45.5
MC Write 39.8
MC Mixed 41
120% 42.1 GB/s
SC Read 27.9
SC Write 26.7
SC Mixed 40.5
91% 31.7 GB/s
Latency 71.1
56% 71.1 ns
Poor: 67%
This bench: 114%
Great: 139%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ROG STRIX B550-F GAMING (WI-FI) Builds (Compare 9,789 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 142%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 103%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus ROG STRIX B550-F GAMING (WI-FI) - $199

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 93% - Outstanding Total price: $925
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $285WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $123
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $253Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback