Today's hottest deals

Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 200%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 104%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 196%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (66th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 34 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 107%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics195% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive99.4% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS  (all builds)
Memory25.6 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210320
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 03 '21 at 11:25
Run Duration230 Seconds
Run User VNM-User
Background CPU2%
Watch Gameplay: 3080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (66th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 5800X-$155
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
107% Outstanding
Memory 92.2
1-Core 170
2-Core 338
108% 200 Pts
4-Core 650
8-Core 1,042
104% 846 Pts
64-Core 1,578
98% 1,578 Pts
Poor: 84%
This bench: 107%
Great: 110%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3080-$709
CLim: 2130 MHz, MLim: 5000 MHz, Ram: 10GB, Driver: 497.09
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
195% Outstanding
Lighting 287
Reflection 336
Parallax 323
234% 315 fps
MRender 312
Gravity 236
Splatting 172
189% 240 fps
Poor: 163%
This bench: 195%
Great: 202%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 EVO M.2 250GB
151GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 341 334 329 321 321 316 MB/s
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
99.4% Outstanding
Read 507
Write 441
Mixed 315
SusWrite 327
89% 397 MB/s
4K Read 34.4
4K Write 99.2
4K Mixed 43.3
160% 59 MB/s
DQ Read 246
DQ Write 199
DQ Mixed 189
150% 211 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 99.4%
Great: 126%
Samsung 870 EVO 1TB-$107
349GB free
Firmware: SVT0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 452 448 448 457 444 413 MB/s
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
119% Outstanding
Read 492
Write 443
Mixed 441
SusWrite 444
102% 455 MB/s
4K Read 45.9
4K Write 98.7
4K Mixed 60.2
199% 68.3 MB/s
DQ Read 255
DQ Write 199
DQ Mixed 222
168% 225 MB/s
Poor: 82%
This bench: 119%
Great: 137%
WDC WD20 EZAZ-00L9GB0 2TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: 80.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 181 183 182 183 182 181 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
37.7% Below average
Read 204
Write 179
Mixed 131
SusWrite 182
39% 174 MB/s
4K Read 39.8
4K Write 12.5
4K Mixed 1
68% 17.8 MB/s
DQ Read 1.1
DQ Write 11.1
DQ Mixed 0.7
2% 4.3 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 37.7%
Great: 38%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMT32GX4M2E3200C16 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3400 MHz
Performing below potential (10th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
64.7% Good
MC Read 23.8
MC Write 20.9
MC Mixed 20.2
62% 21.6 GB/s
SC Read 23.6
SC Write 24.1
SC Mixed 23
67% 23.6 GB/s
Latency 63.7
63% 63.7 ns
Poor: 58%
This bench: 64.7%
Great: 119%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF GAMING X570-PLUS Builds (Compare 7,085 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 129%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS - $200

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 100% - Outstanding Total price: $886
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $296WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $209Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback